This is excellent video detailing (in easy to understand plain English) what brought us to this point in our economy today. Enjoy, and pass along.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Republican Leadership Council
I was recently notified that I received the endorsement of the Republican Leadership Council. I attended the Republican National Convention in St. Paul where I spent some time with distinguished Republican's such as Pennsylvania Governor and former Homeland Security Chief Tom Ridge, former California Governor Pete Wilson and New Jersey Governor and former EPA Chief Christine Todd Whitman.
Friday, September 19, 2008
Illinois Tops National Unemployment Data
Ill. 7.3% unemployment tops US average
By: Lorene Yue Sept. 18, 2008
(Crain’s) — Illinois’ jobless rate in August not only beat the national average; it’s also the second-highest figure in nearly 15 years.
The seasonally adjusted rate of 7.3% was slightly higher than July’s 7.2% and higher than the country’s 6.1% August unemployment rate, according to figures released Thursday by the U.S Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Illinois Department of Employment Security.
There were 491,500 Illinois unemployed residents in August, the fourth-consecutive month that figure has grown.
The highest unemployment rate in the past 15 years was a 7.5% rate recorded in September 1993.
By: Lorene Yue Sept. 18, 2008
(Crain’s) — Illinois’ jobless rate in August not only beat the national average; it’s also the second-highest figure in nearly 15 years.
The seasonally adjusted rate of 7.3% was slightly higher than July’s 7.2% and higher than the country’s 6.1% August unemployment rate, according to figures released Thursday by the U.S Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Illinois Department of Employment Security.
There were 491,500 Illinois unemployed residents in August, the fourth-consecutive month that figure has grown.
The highest unemployment rate in the past 15 years was a 7.5% rate recorded in September 1993.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
The T. Boone Pickens Plan for Energy Policy
T. Boone Pickens is a successful oil and energy man and he has a plan to get our energy policy on track. As a member of the group Republicans for Environmental Protection I believe it is a plan worth considering. He says drill now but also invest in wind energy and other alternate sources. Here is a synopis:
The Pickens Plan for Energy
By REP Policy Director Jim DiPeso, published in the Hawaii Reporter on July 10, 2008
There are congressmen who see oil drilling hither and yon as the magical answer to the high cost of fuel.
Then, there is T. Boone Pickens, the Texas oilman from central casting whose Pickens Plan would put the U.S. on a healthier energy diet with a significantly smaller serving of oil.
The Pickens Plan would not be easy to implement, but it's a terrific example of the creative thinking that we need in order to fix our country's energy predicament. That's more than can be said for the tired ideas coming out of Congress.
The latest bromide to hit the airwaves is "drill here, drill now, pay less." The peddlers hope to convince Americans that a return to the glory days of cheap and easy oil is just around the corner.
Don't be fooled. As Pickens the oilman will tell any sloganeering congressman who cares to listen, cheap and easy oil is a thing of the past. Demand is up and low-cost pockets of black gold are increasingly hard to come by.
It's time to try something new. The Pickens Plan's centerpiece is to substitute wind for natural gas for meeting some 20 percent of the nation's electric power needs. In a recent report, the Department of Energy said that boosting wind's share of power generation to 20 percent is doable.
The freed-up gas would then be available to fuel automobiles, cutting oil imports by more than one-third.
Pickens says his primary motive is to reduce the drain of American dollars to oil exporting regimes, which he calls "the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind."
The Pickens Plan would benefit his sizable wind and natural gas investments. But no one should begrudge Pickens the wealth that would be his if the plan works.
Will it? That depends on many things falling into place. First, wind energy plants must beat the price of gas-fired generators. Wind is the fastest growing energy source in the country, but investment will plunge if Congress fails to renew production tax credits due to expire at the end of the year.
The wind blows hard and steadily on the western Great Plains. But few people live there. Transmission lines would have to be built to ferry the juice to big loads on the coasts. Utilities would have to figure out the technicalities of integrating wind energy into their grids.
A fueling infrastructure for natural gas-fueled cars would have to be built up. Automakers would have to manufacture the cars and consumers would have to be willing to buy them.
Pickens estimates that building the wind turbines and transmission lines would cost $1.2 trillion. It's a big number, but we spend that much on foreign oil every 20 months.
As Pickens points out, his plan is not a complete or permanent solution for oil dependence. But if it works, it would serve as a bridge to a more robust transportation system, with cars running partially or entirely on electricity. The juice may come from on-board fuel cells, or, perhaps more likely, from quick-charging batteries supplied by wind, other renewables, nukes, or coal plants equipped to capture and bury carbon dioxide.
The Pickens Plan is worth a serious look. It's not a panacea, but there is none to be found. The sooner we face that, the faster we can build an energy economy that cuts our dependence on dangerous regimes, keeps dollars at home, and helps us be better environmental stewards.
The Pickens Plan for Energy
By REP Policy Director Jim DiPeso, published in the Hawaii Reporter on July 10, 2008
There are congressmen who see oil drilling hither and yon as the magical answer to the high cost of fuel.
Then, there is T. Boone Pickens, the Texas oilman from central casting whose Pickens Plan would put the U.S. on a healthier energy diet with a significantly smaller serving of oil.
The Pickens Plan would not be easy to implement, but it's a terrific example of the creative thinking that we need in order to fix our country's energy predicament. That's more than can be said for the tired ideas coming out of Congress.
The latest bromide to hit the airwaves is "drill here, drill now, pay less." The peddlers hope to convince Americans that a return to the glory days of cheap and easy oil is just around the corner.
Don't be fooled. As Pickens the oilman will tell any sloganeering congressman who cares to listen, cheap and easy oil is a thing of the past. Demand is up and low-cost pockets of black gold are increasingly hard to come by.
It's time to try something new. The Pickens Plan's centerpiece is to substitute wind for natural gas for meeting some 20 percent of the nation's electric power needs. In a recent report, the Department of Energy said that boosting wind's share of power generation to 20 percent is doable.
The freed-up gas would then be available to fuel automobiles, cutting oil imports by more than one-third.
Pickens says his primary motive is to reduce the drain of American dollars to oil exporting regimes, which he calls "the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind."
The Pickens Plan would benefit his sizable wind and natural gas investments. But no one should begrudge Pickens the wealth that would be his if the plan works.
Will it? That depends on many things falling into place. First, wind energy plants must beat the price of gas-fired generators. Wind is the fastest growing energy source in the country, but investment will plunge if Congress fails to renew production tax credits due to expire at the end of the year.
The wind blows hard and steadily on the western Great Plains. But few people live there. Transmission lines would have to be built to ferry the juice to big loads on the coasts. Utilities would have to figure out the technicalities of integrating wind energy into their grids.
A fueling infrastructure for natural gas-fueled cars would have to be built up. Automakers would have to manufacture the cars and consumers would have to be willing to buy them.
Pickens estimates that building the wind turbines and transmission lines would cost $1.2 trillion. It's a big number, but we spend that much on foreign oil every 20 months.
As Pickens points out, his plan is not a complete or permanent solution for oil dependence. But if it works, it would serve as a bridge to a more robust transportation system, with cars running partially or entirely on electricity. The juice may come from on-board fuel cells, or, perhaps more likely, from quick-charging batteries supplied by wind, other renewables, nukes, or coal plants equipped to capture and bury carbon dioxide.
The Pickens Plan is worth a serious look. It's not a panacea, but there is none to be found. The sooner we face that, the faster we can build an energy economy that cuts our dependence on dangerous regimes, keeps dollars at home, and helps us be better environmental stewards.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Senator Matt Murphy Proposes Legislation to Curb Family Succession in Illinois Politics
STATE: Law would curb family succession
08/28/2008, 10:28 am
Comment on this story | Print this story
Andrea Zelinski, sng2@springnet1.com, 217-524-5797,
In Illinois, politics is all in the family.
But state Sen. Matt Murphy, R-Palatine, thinks it's time for a divorce.
He plans to introduce a bill this week that would make it harder for politicians who bow out of an election to pave the way to appoint someone of their choosing -- like a son or a daughter.
"I think people are fed up. They are offended that so many Chicago politicians seem to think they have a right to hand down a public office to their children," he said. "They don't trust us. Things like handing off a seat and carving voters out of the process makes it hard for them to trust us."
Just last week, Sen. President Emil Jones withdrew his name from the November ballot after announcing his retirement. His son, Emil Jones III, promptly filled his spot on the ticket after an approval from the district's Democratic committeemen.
State Sen. Mike Jacobs, D-East Moline, was appointed to his Senate seat in 2005 after his father, former Sen. Denny Jacobs, stepped down from office.
"If you're dad's a fireman, you're going to be interested in being a firefighter. If you're dad's a construction worker, you're going to be interested in construction," said Jacobs, a fourth-generation elected official. "My father happened to be a politician."
Democratic Party chairmen appointed him in 2005 -- although sitting Rep. Mike Boland, D-East Moline, expressed interest in the post. Jacobs ran his first successful election as an incumbent in 2007.
County political committees choose who will fill mid-term and pre-election vacancies, said state Rep. Frank Mautino, D-Spring Valley, who serves as chairman for Bureau County Democrats.
He, too, was appointed to fill his father's seat in the General Assembly after state Rep. Richard Mautino died in office in 1991.
"Whenever this happens, it hits a nerve with the public," said Cindi Canary of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform. "What tends to get people's goats is when it appears to be very blatant when it's their son or daughter."
While Murphy said the bill isn't specifically aimed at Jones, the matter did renew some questions he's had about the political appointment process.
In 1987, Kankakee Democratic County Chairman Phil Novak appointed himself to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives.
Murphy said his bill would encompass federal, state and local politicians and would only be exempt in the event of a lawmaker's death in office or a debilitating illness that prevents them from serving their post.
The bill would require those recusing themselves from the election to make that decision official 90 days before the ballot is certified. In the case of Jones' retirement, he would have had to make that call by the end of May.
Under the proposed legislation, there then would be a special primary election where voters could choose between party candidates looking to fill the senator's seat in the November election.
But that's an expensive venture, says Ron Michaelson, former head of the State Board of Elections. The cost to rent polling places, pay election judges, order supplies and pay printing costs all will fall to taxpayers, he noted.
"It's a pretty tricky issue to solve," Michaelson
08/28/2008, 10:28 am
Comment on this story | Print this story
Andrea Zelinski, sng2@springnet1.com, 217-524-5797,
In Illinois, politics is all in the family.
But state Sen. Matt Murphy, R-Palatine, thinks it's time for a divorce.
He plans to introduce a bill this week that would make it harder for politicians who bow out of an election to pave the way to appoint someone of their choosing -- like a son or a daughter.
"I think people are fed up. They are offended that so many Chicago politicians seem to think they have a right to hand down a public office to their children," he said. "They don't trust us. Things like handing off a seat and carving voters out of the process makes it hard for them to trust us."
Just last week, Sen. President Emil Jones withdrew his name from the November ballot after announcing his retirement. His son, Emil Jones III, promptly filled his spot on the ticket after an approval from the district's Democratic committeemen.
State Sen. Mike Jacobs, D-East Moline, was appointed to his Senate seat in 2005 after his father, former Sen. Denny Jacobs, stepped down from office.
"If you're dad's a fireman, you're going to be interested in being a firefighter. If you're dad's a construction worker, you're going to be interested in construction," said Jacobs, a fourth-generation elected official. "My father happened to be a politician."
Democratic Party chairmen appointed him in 2005 -- although sitting Rep. Mike Boland, D-East Moline, expressed interest in the post. Jacobs ran his first successful election as an incumbent in 2007.
County political committees choose who will fill mid-term and pre-election vacancies, said state Rep. Frank Mautino, D-Spring Valley, who serves as chairman for Bureau County Democrats.
He, too, was appointed to fill his father's seat in the General Assembly after state Rep. Richard Mautino died in office in 1991.
"Whenever this happens, it hits a nerve with the public," said Cindi Canary of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform. "What tends to get people's goats is when it appears to be very blatant when it's their son or daughter."
While Murphy said the bill isn't specifically aimed at Jones, the matter did renew some questions he's had about the political appointment process.
In 1987, Kankakee Democratic County Chairman Phil Novak appointed himself to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives.
Murphy said his bill would encompass federal, state and local politicians and would only be exempt in the event of a lawmaker's death in office or a debilitating illness that prevents them from serving their post.
The bill would require those recusing themselves from the election to make that decision official 90 days before the ballot is certified. In the case of Jones' retirement, he would have had to make that call by the end of May.
Under the proposed legislation, there then would be a special primary election where voters could choose between party candidates looking to fill the senator's seat in the November election.
But that's an expensive venture, says Ron Michaelson, former head of the State Board of Elections. The cost to rent polling places, pay election judges, order supplies and pay printing costs all will fall to taxpayers, he noted.
"It's a pretty tricky issue to solve," Michaelson
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Obama's Illinois Democrat Party--Not exactly a model of how to govern...Interesting Article from today's Daily Herald
When Barack Obama announced his candidacy for president from the steps of the Old State Capitol, he described Springfield as the crucible where he learned the art of politics and bridging division.
"It was here in Springfield where I saw all that is America converge," he told a crowd of thousands that frigid February day in 2007. "It was here where we learned to disagree without being disagreeable. That it is possible to compromise so long as you know those principles that can never be compromised. And that so long as we are willing to listen to each other we can assume the best in people instead of the worst."
One has to wonder today what Springfield Obama was talking about.
Given complete control of state government, Illinois Democrats have produced unbalanced budgets, callous funding cuts, and antagonistic gridlock.
Yet the Democratic leader Obama describes as his political mentor believed state lawmakers deserved a pay raise for their work.
And the Democratic governor whose administration is under criminal investigation is quick to remind anyone listening of Obama's ties to those in trouble.
Plus, the Democrat who Obama backed for Cook County Board president produced the nation's highest sales tax.
Sheesh, it seems like enough to make Obama bid aloha to his adopted Land of Lincoln and start calling himself a Hawaiian Democrat. In the midst of Obama's shining moment in Denver this week, the Illinois Democratic Party could be a political blemish.
"I would guess they're going to try to keep Illinois out of the spotlight and if Illinois is in the spotlight, it will be a challenge for them to show the unity and hope that the national campaign is trying to emphasize," said John S. Jackson, political scientist and author who's written about presidential races, Obama's career and Illinois politics.
Some Illinois Democrats seem to recognize this. Gov. Rod Blagojevich was recently asked if he had any official role in this weeklong coronation of Obama.
"I've got a big speaking role," Blagojevich said. "I think it's something like four o'clock in the morning in the men's room of the convention center speaking to a handful of voters. I'm hopeful I can persuade them and we can carry Colorado.
The line might be funnier if Blagojevich hadn't used it four years earlier.
But there's little humor among the state's Democrats these days.
"They kill jobs. They kill education funding, they try to take away health care from people," the governor recently said of the Democrats in the Illinois House.
And in a recent memo, Illinois House Speaker and Democratic Party Chairman Michael Madigan criticized labor heads for buying into "the (expletive deleted) of the Blagojevich people."
Heading into this Democratic celebration, Illinois Democrats are downplaying their differences and painting the picture of a party united behind Obama, who was back in Springfield Saturday to appear with is running mate, Joe Biden.
"At this moment, everyone's on the same page," said Steve Brown, Madigan's spokesman, noting that Democrats moved up the Illinois primary to increase the visibility of Illinois and Obama's campaign.
The Chicago Democrat's presidential campaign offered this comment when asked whether it was concerned about the Illinois dysfunction becoming a political problem.
"Voters know that in Illinois and in Washington, Barack Obama stood up to members of both parties to pass sweeping ethics reforms that reduced the influence of money and special interests over the legislative process," said Illinois spokesman Justin DeJong.
Still, while the Illinois delegation will be front-and-center when Obama takes the stage later this week, don't look for him to tout any great accomplishments from back home. The ethics legislation he championed has been deemed insufficient. The new, tougher version lawmakers sent to the governor has - in a truly Illinois move - become a bargaining chip in a battle over billions worth of government spending.
Obama's campaign promises to bring national health care. But Illinois' venture into expanded health care has produced turmoil at every turn. Obama's idea of taxing employers who don't provide benefits to pay for health care is one that was rejected here.
Meanwhile, the Illinois Republican Party is trying to capitalize on this Democratic dysfunction, saying Democrats have failed at their chance to run the state. Don't be surprised if the McCain campaign doesn't also begin using this as ammunition.
"The campaign is aware of what's going on in Illinois," said Western Springs Republican state Rep. Jim Durkin, co-chair of McCain's Illinois effort. "I think it's fair game and I think the Republicans nationally should pounce on it."
With friends like these...
Here's a look at some of the key figures in Illinois politics and why Barack Obama might not want them in the spotlight.
Todd Stroger: Already facing claims of nepotism and cronyism regarding his ascension to Cook County Board president, Stroger then pushed a sales tax hike that makes the county's the highest in the country. Obama backed Stroger for the post.
Emil Jones Jr.: Obama's political mentor is an old-school Chicago Democrat who steered state money to favored institutions and got family on state payroll. Amidst recent Illinois financial gridlock, Jones wanted higher pay for lawmakers.
Michael Madigan: After Obama's pick for state treasurer - Alexi Giannoulias - beat Madigan's in 2006, the Illinois House speaker and Democratic Party chairman contemptuously called Obama "the Messiah." They've since buried the hatchet. Accused of thwarting the governor's agenda to advance his daughter, the state's attorney general.
Rod Blagojevich: During a recent spat with reporters, the Illinois governor repeatedly brought up Obama's name when asked about the conviction of Blagojevich's political fundraiser and adviser Tony Rezko. Blagojevich's administration is under federal investigation for its hiring and contracting practices.
Tony Rezko: Convicted this year for a multimillion-dollar state pension kickback scheme he orchestrated trading on his clout with the governor. Also had been a longtime pal of Obama who most recently helped the Obamas buy their Hyde Park mansion in 2005.
"It was here in Springfield where I saw all that is America converge," he told a crowd of thousands that frigid February day in 2007. "It was here where we learned to disagree without being disagreeable. That it is possible to compromise so long as you know those principles that can never be compromised. And that so long as we are willing to listen to each other we can assume the best in people instead of the worst."
One has to wonder today what Springfield Obama was talking about.
Given complete control of state government, Illinois Democrats have produced unbalanced budgets, callous funding cuts, and antagonistic gridlock.
Yet the Democratic leader Obama describes as his political mentor believed state lawmakers deserved a pay raise for their work.
And the Democratic governor whose administration is under criminal investigation is quick to remind anyone listening of Obama's ties to those in trouble.
Plus, the Democrat who Obama backed for Cook County Board president produced the nation's highest sales tax.
Sheesh, it seems like enough to make Obama bid aloha to his adopted Land of Lincoln and start calling himself a Hawaiian Democrat. In the midst of Obama's shining moment in Denver this week, the Illinois Democratic Party could be a political blemish.
"I would guess they're going to try to keep Illinois out of the spotlight and if Illinois is in the spotlight, it will be a challenge for them to show the unity and hope that the national campaign is trying to emphasize," said John S. Jackson, political scientist and author who's written about presidential races, Obama's career and Illinois politics.
Some Illinois Democrats seem to recognize this. Gov. Rod Blagojevich was recently asked if he had any official role in this weeklong coronation of Obama.
"I've got a big speaking role," Blagojevich said. "I think it's something like four o'clock in the morning in the men's room of the convention center speaking to a handful of voters. I'm hopeful I can persuade them and we can carry Colorado.
The line might be funnier if Blagojevich hadn't used it four years earlier.
But there's little humor among the state's Democrats these days.
"They kill jobs. They kill education funding, they try to take away health care from people," the governor recently said of the Democrats in the Illinois House.
And in a recent memo, Illinois House Speaker and Democratic Party Chairman Michael Madigan criticized labor heads for buying into "the (expletive deleted) of the Blagojevich people."
Heading into this Democratic celebration, Illinois Democrats are downplaying their differences and painting the picture of a party united behind Obama, who was back in Springfield Saturday to appear with is running mate, Joe Biden.
"At this moment, everyone's on the same page," said Steve Brown, Madigan's spokesman, noting that Democrats moved up the Illinois primary to increase the visibility of Illinois and Obama's campaign.
The Chicago Democrat's presidential campaign offered this comment when asked whether it was concerned about the Illinois dysfunction becoming a political problem.
"Voters know that in Illinois and in Washington, Barack Obama stood up to members of both parties to pass sweeping ethics reforms that reduced the influence of money and special interests over the legislative process," said Illinois spokesman Justin DeJong.
Still, while the Illinois delegation will be front-and-center when Obama takes the stage later this week, don't look for him to tout any great accomplishments from back home. The ethics legislation he championed has been deemed insufficient. The new, tougher version lawmakers sent to the governor has - in a truly Illinois move - become a bargaining chip in a battle over billions worth of government spending.
Obama's campaign promises to bring national health care. But Illinois' venture into expanded health care has produced turmoil at every turn. Obama's idea of taxing employers who don't provide benefits to pay for health care is one that was rejected here.
Meanwhile, the Illinois Republican Party is trying to capitalize on this Democratic dysfunction, saying Democrats have failed at their chance to run the state. Don't be surprised if the McCain campaign doesn't also begin using this as ammunition.
"The campaign is aware of what's going on in Illinois," said Western Springs Republican state Rep. Jim Durkin, co-chair of McCain's Illinois effort. "I think it's fair game and I think the Republicans nationally should pounce on it."
With friends like these...
Here's a look at some of the key figures in Illinois politics and why Barack Obama might not want them in the spotlight.
Todd Stroger: Already facing claims of nepotism and cronyism regarding his ascension to Cook County Board president, Stroger then pushed a sales tax hike that makes the county's the highest in the country. Obama backed Stroger for the post.
Emil Jones Jr.: Obama's political mentor is an old-school Chicago Democrat who steered state money to favored institutions and got family on state payroll. Amidst recent Illinois financial gridlock, Jones wanted higher pay for lawmakers.
Michael Madigan: After Obama's pick for state treasurer - Alexi Giannoulias - beat Madigan's in 2006, the Illinois House speaker and Democratic Party chairman contemptuously called Obama "the Messiah." They've since buried the hatchet. Accused of thwarting the governor's agenda to advance his daughter, the state's attorney general.
Rod Blagojevich: During a recent spat with reporters, the Illinois governor repeatedly brought up Obama's name when asked about the conviction of Blagojevich's political fundraiser and adviser Tony Rezko. Blagojevich's administration is under federal investigation for its hiring and contracting practices.
Tony Rezko: Convicted this year for a multimillion-dollar state pension kickback scheme he orchestrated trading on his clout with the governor. Also had been a longtime pal of Obama who most recently helped the Obamas buy their Hyde Park mansion in 2005.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
While The Economy Goes From Bad To Worse The Legislature Engages In Politics As Usual...
Do-nothing special legislative session called a 'sham'
By Kurt Erickson
kurt-erickson@lee.net
Advertisement
SPRINGFIELD -- The question of the day for many state lawmakers Tuesday was: Why are we here? Called into special session by Gov. Rod Blagojevich, members of the House and Senate were directed to do something about the state’s school funding formula, which allows wide disparities in funding levels among the state’s 800-plus school districts.
But nearly everyone agreed the topic simply cannot be handled in a one-day, hours long session.
“It’s absurd,” said state Rep. Bill Mitchell, R-Forsyth. “We know we can’t accomplish anything.”
Mitchell was among those who were particularly bothered by the $40,000 cost of calling lawmakers back to town at a time when budget cuts have affected numerous parts of state government. The issue, instead, should be dealt with during the regular legislative session which runs from January until June, he said.
House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego, slammed Blagojevich for calling the special session.
“Today is a joke. It’s a sham. It’s a farce,” Cross said.
If nothing else, the special session put a spotlight on an issue that has been percolating for years.
In recent weeks, state Sen. James Meeks, a Calumet City Democrat, has brought the disparities in school funding to the forefront again.
Meeks, pastor of a large Chicago church, is calling for Chicago Public School students to boycott the first day of classes next month to protest a lack of state funding. He made his pitch for a funding revamp to Senate Democrats Tuesday, but emerged angry that Blagojevich was spending more time at the state fairgrounds Tuesday than meeting with lawmakers.
“He did not call a special session to deal with cows. He called a special session to deal with kids,” Meeks said. “If his priority is cows rather than kids, I guess he proved that today.”
Blagojevich says he opposes getting rid of local property taxes as the primary funding source for schools. He also said he’d veto any tax increase for education.
“I’m not going to raise taxes on people,” Blagojevich told reporters on Friday.
To avoid having to raise taxes for schools, Blagojevich previously called for using money from selling the state lottery to finance schools.
But, he now wants to use those proceeds to pay for a $25 billion public works program.
At the Illinois State Fair Tuesday evening, Blagojevich expressed disappointment.
“It’s disappointing to see that all the lawmakers did was convene for about a half an hour -not many of them showed up -and that was their answer for education funding,” the governor said.
By Kurt Erickson
kurt-erickson@lee.net
Advertisement
SPRINGFIELD -- The question of the day for many state lawmakers Tuesday was: Why are we here? Called into special session by Gov. Rod Blagojevich, members of the House and Senate were directed to do something about the state’s school funding formula, which allows wide disparities in funding levels among the state’s 800-plus school districts.
But nearly everyone agreed the topic simply cannot be handled in a one-day, hours long session.
“It’s absurd,” said state Rep. Bill Mitchell, R-Forsyth. “We know we can’t accomplish anything.”
Mitchell was among those who were particularly bothered by the $40,000 cost of calling lawmakers back to town at a time when budget cuts have affected numerous parts of state government. The issue, instead, should be dealt with during the regular legislative session which runs from January until June, he said.
House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego, slammed Blagojevich for calling the special session.
“Today is a joke. It’s a sham. It’s a farce,” Cross said.
If nothing else, the special session put a spotlight on an issue that has been percolating for years.
In recent weeks, state Sen. James Meeks, a Calumet City Democrat, has brought the disparities in school funding to the forefront again.
Meeks, pastor of a large Chicago church, is calling for Chicago Public School students to boycott the first day of classes next month to protest a lack of state funding. He made his pitch for a funding revamp to Senate Democrats Tuesday, but emerged angry that Blagojevich was spending more time at the state fairgrounds Tuesday than meeting with lawmakers.
“He did not call a special session to deal with cows. He called a special session to deal with kids,” Meeks said. “If his priority is cows rather than kids, I guess he proved that today.”
Blagojevich says he opposes getting rid of local property taxes as the primary funding source for schools. He also said he’d veto any tax increase for education.
“I’m not going to raise taxes on people,” Blagojevich told reporters on Friday.
To avoid having to raise taxes for schools, Blagojevich previously called for using money from selling the state lottery to finance schools.
But, he now wants to use those proceeds to pay for a $25 billion public works program.
At the Illinois State Fair Tuesday evening, Blagojevich expressed disappointment.
“It’s disappointing to see that all the lawmakers did was convene for about a half an hour -not many of them showed up -and that was their answer for education funding,” the governor said.
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Lake Forest Days Parade
I hope to see you and your family at the upcoming Lake Forest Days Parade on Wed, August 6th in downtown Lake Forest at 10am. I'll be there marching in the parade and talking with voters along with my friends and supporters. If you are so inclined, join our parade entry and march with us! There is always room for more people. See you Wed.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
Speaker Madigan Refusing to Attend Meetings...
Grow Up Guys! This isn't kindergarten where you can take your toys and go home--this is our state--start governing.
Blagojevich scales back construction plan
Associated Press
1:34 PM CDT, July 31, 2008
CHICAGO - Lawmakers say Governor Rod Blagojevich has proposed ratcheting down the price tag of a statewide construction program and is abandoning a proposal to expand gambling to pay for it.
Top lawmakers who attended Thursday's meeting at Blagojevich's Chicago office say the capital plan would shrink from $34 billion to $25 billion.
It would be paid for in part by a partial lease of the state lottery rather than a large gambling expansion.
Representative Barbara Flynn Currie is already expressing skepticism about the lottery lease. She's a surrogate for House Speaker Michael Madigan, who skipped the meeting.
But House Republican leader Tom Cross says he thinks there's support for this latest plan, and he says he'll take it back to his caucus members.
Blagojevich scales back construction plan
Associated Press
1:34 PM CDT, July 31, 2008
CHICAGO - Lawmakers say Governor Rod Blagojevich has proposed ratcheting down the price tag of a statewide construction program and is abandoning a proposal to expand gambling to pay for it.
Top lawmakers who attended Thursday's meeting at Blagojevich's Chicago office say the capital plan would shrink from $34 billion to $25 billion.
It would be paid for in part by a partial lease of the state lottery rather than a large gambling expansion.
Representative Barbara Flynn Currie is already expressing skepticism about the lottery lease. She's a surrogate for House Speaker Michael Madigan, who skipped the meeting.
But House Republican leader Tom Cross says he thinks there's support for this latest plan, and he says he'll take it back to his caucus members.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Tim Stratton Lays Out Ethics Reform for State of Illinois
Stratton Plan to Enact Tough Government Ethics Laws
For Immediate Release Contact:
Tim Stratton
(312)505-3599
Kevin Artl
July 25, 2008 (815) 577-1400
Stratton Announces Agenda to Enact Nation’s Toughest Anti-Corruption Laws
Glencoe…Equipped with a commitment to regain public trust in government and reform the way Illinois conducts business, Republican candidate for State Representative of the 58th District Tim Stratton has a plan to enact the nation’s toughest anti-corruption laws. As part of the House Republican “Agenda for Action,” Stratton wants to end pay-to-play politics and provide greater transparency and oversight to state government.
“Illinois has become a playground of political corruption and U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has referred to the current administration as pay-to-play on steroids. Tax payers deserve a state government that finds pride in operating under the most honest and ethical principles,” Stratton said.
If elected, Stratton plans to put an end to pay-to-play politics and increase transparency by:
banning government officials from soliciting contributions from contractors conducting business with their office
preventing elected officials and other state appointees and employees from receiving fees related to legal, banking and consulting work with state bonds
increasing disclosures for investment advisors and consultants with work before a State board or commission
“As a frequent speaker across the state on government finance, I believe Illinois must conduct business like a corporation with appropriate checks and balances. It is simply wrong to trade jobs for campaign contributions. Instead companies who do business with the state should have to earn their work based on their quality of service and competitive costs,” Stratton said.
“If elected, I will work to ensure that state government is accountable to the people and not to special interest groups,” Stratton said.
###
For Immediate Release Contact:
Tim Stratton
(312)505-3599
Kevin Artl
July 25, 2008 (815) 577-1400
Stratton Announces Agenda to Enact Nation’s Toughest Anti-Corruption Laws
Glencoe…Equipped with a commitment to regain public trust in government and reform the way Illinois conducts business, Republican candidate for State Representative of the 58th District Tim Stratton has a plan to enact the nation’s toughest anti-corruption laws. As part of the House Republican “Agenda for Action,” Stratton wants to end pay-to-play politics and provide greater transparency and oversight to state government.
“Illinois has become a playground of political corruption and U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has referred to the current administration as pay-to-play on steroids. Tax payers deserve a state government that finds pride in operating under the most honest and ethical principles,” Stratton said.
If elected, Stratton plans to put an end to pay-to-play politics and increase transparency by:
banning government officials from soliciting contributions from contractors conducting business with their office
preventing elected officials and other state appointees and employees from receiving fees related to legal, banking and consulting work with state bonds
increasing disclosures for investment advisors and consultants with work before a State board or commission
“As a frequent speaker across the state on government finance, I believe Illinois must conduct business like a corporation with appropriate checks and balances. It is simply wrong to trade jobs for campaign contributions. Instead companies who do business with the state should have to earn their work based on their quality of service and competitive costs,” Stratton said.
“If elected, I will work to ensure that state government is accountable to the people and not to special interest groups,” Stratton said.
###
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Stratton for Property Tax Relief
For Immediate Release Contact: Kevin Artl
July 23, 2008 (815) 577-1400
State Rep. Candidate Tim Stratton Announces Plan to Produce Relief for Skyrocketing Property Taxes
Glencoe…Skyrocketing property taxes are putting an added financial burden on Lake County families and seniors. Republican candidate for State Representative of the 58th District Tim Stratton demonstrated his commitment to secure property tax relief by rolling out an Agenda for Action that will keep money in the bank accounts of Illinois residents.
Included as part of their Agenda for Action, Stratton and House Republicans propose:
• Increasing the Homestead Exemption from $6,000 to $7,500 and increasing the Senior Homestead Exemption from $4,000 to $5,500
• Doubling the Income Tax Credit from 5% to 10% to Increase the Property Tax Rebate
“Families and seniors in Lake County are enduring enough financial hardships with prices at the pump consistently climbing above $4 per gallon, escalating college tuitions rates, and the increasing costs of everyday necessities like food and medicine. During today’s troubling economy, we have a real opportunity to offer residents relief by helping them save on their property tax bills,” Stratton said.
The Homestead Exemption is applied against the assessed value of a home to reduce the assessment. Seniors can utilize both the General and Senior Homestead Exemptions; and families can utilize only the General Homestead Exemption. Under Stratton’s plan, a senior’s $200,000 home assessment would be lowered to $187,000 and their property taxes would be reduced.
“Many seniors are on fixed incomes and this type of savings would allow them to keep their homes. We also don’t want young families to be turned away from our community because they can’t afford the taxes,” Stratton said.
-More-
Page 2
Additionally, all Illinois homeowners receive a 5% credit on their income taxes for property taxes paid. A homeowner who pays $5,500 in property taxes currently receives a $275 tax credit; but under Wait’s plan, the credit would double to $550.
Stratton, a Glencoe resident, is running to replace State Representative Karen May and draws a clear distinction between his commitments to fight taxes and her willingness to raise taxes.
“If elected, securing immediate property tax relief will be among my highest priorities. This is an issue that people care about because it’s affecting their quality of life and financial well-being,” Stratton said.
###
July 23, 2008 (815) 577-1400
State Rep. Candidate Tim Stratton Announces Plan to Produce Relief for Skyrocketing Property Taxes
Glencoe…Skyrocketing property taxes are putting an added financial burden on Lake County families and seniors. Republican candidate for State Representative of the 58th District Tim Stratton demonstrated his commitment to secure property tax relief by rolling out an Agenda for Action that will keep money in the bank accounts of Illinois residents.
Included as part of their Agenda for Action, Stratton and House Republicans propose:
• Increasing the Homestead Exemption from $6,000 to $7,500 and increasing the Senior Homestead Exemption from $4,000 to $5,500
• Doubling the Income Tax Credit from 5% to 10% to Increase the Property Tax Rebate
“Families and seniors in Lake County are enduring enough financial hardships with prices at the pump consistently climbing above $4 per gallon, escalating college tuitions rates, and the increasing costs of everyday necessities like food and medicine. During today’s troubling economy, we have a real opportunity to offer residents relief by helping them save on their property tax bills,” Stratton said.
The Homestead Exemption is applied against the assessed value of a home to reduce the assessment. Seniors can utilize both the General and Senior Homestead Exemptions; and families can utilize only the General Homestead Exemption. Under Stratton’s plan, a senior’s $200,000 home assessment would be lowered to $187,000 and their property taxes would be reduced.
“Many seniors are on fixed incomes and this type of savings would allow them to keep their homes. We also don’t want young families to be turned away from our community because they can’t afford the taxes,” Stratton said.
-More-
Page 2
Additionally, all Illinois homeowners receive a 5% credit on their income taxes for property taxes paid. A homeowner who pays $5,500 in property taxes currently receives a $275 tax credit; but under Wait’s plan, the credit would double to $550.
Stratton, a Glencoe resident, is running to replace State Representative Karen May and draws a clear distinction between his commitments to fight taxes and her willingness to raise taxes.
“If elected, securing immediate property tax relief will be among my highest priorities. This is an issue that people care about because it’s affecting their quality of life and financial well-being,” Stratton said.
###
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Daily Herald Embraces Illinois House Republican Agenda
GOP presents its case for reform
Daily Herald Editorial Board
Published: 7/17/2008 12:08 AM
Illinois House Republicans are saying the right things on what the state must do to honor its commitments to the public to be ethically and fiscally responsible in managing tax dollars and providing services.
The question is if a public that is disgusted with the state of affairs in Springfield will warm to these reforms. And, in turn, to the state Republicans proposing them. In that regard, there is not an item on the Republicans' agenda that the public should have trouble embracing.
House Republicans vow to fight for stronger anti-corruption measures - including supportt for an end to the pay-to-play scheming in which those who contribute to campaigns get the benefit of state contracts. Certainly the public is weary of seeing the wretched consequences of such in full display in federal corruption trials. It is satisfying to see the crooks nabbed and imprisoned. But better to have it all stopped before it lands on the desks of federal prosecutors.
The public should be pleased that House Republicans are hitting hard at the Democrats' penchant for expanding state government without a means of paying for it. The most recent and best evidence of this is the budget passed by a Democratic-controlled legislature, that by some Republican estimates is close to $3 billion out of balance. A continuation of such reckless disregard for fiscal discipline is going to hurt taxpayers for generations to come. House Republicans say they won't let that happen.
They also say they will ease the tax burden by offering more tax property relief. They also want to require that proposed state budgets be made available for public scrutiny. This way, taxpayers have a say in how much money should be spent before a vote is taken that leaves them no choice.
The Republicans' agenda goes beyond dollars and cents and ethical use of them. They support programs that taxpayers truly need the state to provide, such as a construction program to repair battered roads and bridges. They want to make higher education more affordable.
But if Republicans aren't having much luck getting their platform endorsed in the legislative chambers, where their power is diluted by their minority party status, they are hoping to make a good impression in the public arena. They are presenting their "Agenda for Action" in town hall meetings. One was held in Arlington Heights on Tuesday night.
The public should care about what Republicans are saying. Of course, Republicans have to back up their agenda by their own actions. These agendas come and go. And it sure wouldn't hurt if they were able to run a candidate for governor on a reform platform who would actually present voters with a real choice and a competitive race.
Voters would do well to end business-as-usual balloting by supporting those who are genuinely committed to reform. Republicans vow to offer such. For that matter, so should Democrats.
Daily Herald Editorial Board
Published: 7/17/2008 12:08 AM
Illinois House Republicans are saying the right things on what the state must do to honor its commitments to the public to be ethically and fiscally responsible in managing tax dollars and providing services.
The question is if a public that is disgusted with the state of affairs in Springfield will warm to these reforms. And, in turn, to the state Republicans proposing them. In that regard, there is not an item on the Republicans' agenda that the public should have trouble embracing.
House Republicans vow to fight for stronger anti-corruption measures - including supportt for an end to the pay-to-play scheming in which those who contribute to campaigns get the benefit of state contracts. Certainly the public is weary of seeing the wretched consequences of such in full display in federal corruption trials. It is satisfying to see the crooks nabbed and imprisoned. But better to have it all stopped before it lands on the desks of federal prosecutors.
The public should be pleased that House Republicans are hitting hard at the Democrats' penchant for expanding state government without a means of paying for it. The most recent and best evidence of this is the budget passed by a Democratic-controlled legislature, that by some Republican estimates is close to $3 billion out of balance. A continuation of such reckless disregard for fiscal discipline is going to hurt taxpayers for generations to come. House Republicans say they won't let that happen.
They also say they will ease the tax burden by offering more tax property relief. They also want to require that proposed state budgets be made available for public scrutiny. This way, taxpayers have a say in how much money should be spent before a vote is taken that leaves them no choice.
The Republicans' agenda goes beyond dollars and cents and ethical use of them. They support programs that taxpayers truly need the state to provide, such as a construction program to repair battered roads and bridges. They want to make higher education more affordable.
But if Republicans aren't having much luck getting their platform endorsed in the legislative chambers, where their power is diluted by their minority party status, they are hoping to make a good impression in the public arena. They are presenting their "Agenda for Action" in town hall meetings. One was held in Arlington Heights on Tuesday night.
The public should care about what Republicans are saying. Of course, Republicans have to back up their agenda by their own actions. These agendas come and go. And it sure wouldn't hurt if they were able to run a candidate for governor on a reform platform who would actually present voters with a real choice and a competitive race.
Voters would do well to end business-as-usual balloting by supporting those who are genuinely committed to reform. Republicans vow to offer such. For that matter, so should Democrats.
Friday, July 11, 2008
We Need More Republicans in Springfield
I think this says it all.
We need more Republicans in Springfield
July 11, 2008Recommend
STEVE HUNTLEY shuntley.cst@gmail.com
They're at it again. This time, a special session of the General Assembly is providing the spectacle of the battling, bickering Democrats slugging it out in the family feud that passes for government in Illinois these days.
Why anyone would cast a Democratic ballot in a legislative race is beyond me. Gov. Blagojevich, not on the ballot this year, is the prime culprit in the Springfield meltdown, but House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President Emil Jones are far from blameless. Still, a Barack Obama avalanche in the fall in a state already becoming ever more blue could pad the Democratic majorities.
I've written that voting Republican in legislative contests, no matter how worthy the Democratic candidate, is the only way you can protest the failure of one-party rule in Illinois. I also have suggested that the GOP needed to come up with its version of a Contract with America to give voters a reason to believe in Republicans again. It turns out that House Minority Leader Tom Cross (R-Kendall) was already working on that. He will unveil a House GOP "Agenda for Action" Tuesday. The seven-point agenda advocates:
• • A capital program to fix roads and bridges, build schools and hospitals, and create 700,000 jobs.
• • A balanced budget, ending carryover of unpaid bills into the next year, and a minimum "sunshine" period for everyone to examine budget bills.
• • Property tax relief.
• • Ethics legislation to end the state's "pay-to-play" scandals.
• • Reversing Blagojevich's years of cutting higher ed funding.
• • Electronic monitoring of abusive men to protect victims of domestic violence.
• • Cyber-safety laws to protect children from online sex offenders.
"There are no quick fixes or gimmicks here, just proposals reflecting the concerns the voters have about fiscal responsibility, job creation, lower taxes and ethics," Cross said. These are issues stuck in legislative limbo or passed but not acted on by Blagojevich.
The agenda's political goal is to "localize" the election and remind voters -- independents, Obamacans (Republicans in favor of the Democratic presidential contender) and Democrats disaffected by the Springfield antics -- that there's a reason to cast split-ticket ballots. That's not to say Republicans are abandoning John McCain. The agenda only recognizes that the enthusiasm for McCain is, in Cross' words, "tempered a little bit by the assumption" Obama will carry Illinois.
Polling in six battleground legislative districts in the northwest suburbs commissioned by Cross found the Democratic-led General Assembly earning only a 24 percent approval rating, with 62 percent of voters disapproving.
Blagojevich fared even worse at 20 percent approval vs. 76 percent disapproving. "Suburban voters are very aware of the lack of state government, that the Democratic leadership can't do anything of substance," Cross said.
In these six districts, the GOP is defending four seats (one open because of a retirement) and trying to retake the other two, the 44th District lost to Rep. Fred Crespo of Streamwood in 2006 and the 56th District lost last year when Rep. Paul Froehlich of Schaumburg switched to the Democratic side of the aisle. Cross said Republicans are "playing offense" to win those back with two strong candidates. Peggy Brothman, former Schaumburg District 54 Board of Education president is running against Crespo, and Anita Forte-Scott, owner of an early childhood education school, is trying to unseat Froehlich.
In the once solidly Republican suburbs, the poll found only a 1-percentage-point advantage for Republicans on the generic ballot.
"It's going to be a very tough year with Obama, the hometown guy with lots of appeal, at the head of their ticket," Cross acknowledged. "But I don't know why the voters would reward the Democrats [in Springfield] with more members." Amen.
We need more Republicans in Springfield
July 11, 2008Recommend
STEVE HUNTLEY shuntley.cst@gmail.com
They're at it again. This time, a special session of the General Assembly is providing the spectacle of the battling, bickering Democrats slugging it out in the family feud that passes for government in Illinois these days.
Why anyone would cast a Democratic ballot in a legislative race is beyond me. Gov. Blagojevich, not on the ballot this year, is the prime culprit in the Springfield meltdown, but House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President Emil Jones are far from blameless. Still, a Barack Obama avalanche in the fall in a state already becoming ever more blue could pad the Democratic majorities.
I've written that voting Republican in legislative contests, no matter how worthy the Democratic candidate, is the only way you can protest the failure of one-party rule in Illinois. I also have suggested that the GOP needed to come up with its version of a Contract with America to give voters a reason to believe in Republicans again. It turns out that House Minority Leader Tom Cross (R-Kendall) was already working on that. He will unveil a House GOP "Agenda for Action" Tuesday. The seven-point agenda advocates:
• • A capital program to fix roads and bridges, build schools and hospitals, and create 700,000 jobs.
• • A balanced budget, ending carryover of unpaid bills into the next year, and a minimum "sunshine" period for everyone to examine budget bills.
• • Property tax relief.
• • Ethics legislation to end the state's "pay-to-play" scandals.
• • Reversing Blagojevich's years of cutting higher ed funding.
• • Electronic monitoring of abusive men to protect victims of domestic violence.
• • Cyber-safety laws to protect children from online sex offenders.
"There are no quick fixes or gimmicks here, just proposals reflecting the concerns the voters have about fiscal responsibility, job creation, lower taxes and ethics," Cross said. These are issues stuck in legislative limbo or passed but not acted on by Blagojevich.
The agenda's political goal is to "localize" the election and remind voters -- independents, Obamacans (Republicans in favor of the Democratic presidential contender) and Democrats disaffected by the Springfield antics -- that there's a reason to cast split-ticket ballots. That's not to say Republicans are abandoning John McCain. The agenda only recognizes that the enthusiasm for McCain is, in Cross' words, "tempered a little bit by the assumption" Obama will carry Illinois.
Polling in six battleground legislative districts in the northwest suburbs commissioned by Cross found the Democratic-led General Assembly earning only a 24 percent approval rating, with 62 percent of voters disapproving.
Blagojevich fared even worse at 20 percent approval vs. 76 percent disapproving. "Suburban voters are very aware of the lack of state government, that the Democratic leadership can't do anything of substance," Cross said.
In these six districts, the GOP is defending four seats (one open because of a retirement) and trying to retake the other two, the 44th District lost to Rep. Fred Crespo of Streamwood in 2006 and the 56th District lost last year when Rep. Paul Froehlich of Schaumburg switched to the Democratic side of the aisle. Cross said Republicans are "playing offense" to win those back with two strong candidates. Peggy Brothman, former Schaumburg District 54 Board of Education president is running against Crespo, and Anita Forte-Scott, owner of an early childhood education school, is trying to unseat Froehlich.
In the once solidly Republican suburbs, the poll found only a 1-percentage-point advantage for Republicans on the generic ballot.
"It's going to be a very tough year with Obama, the hometown guy with lots of appeal, at the head of their ticket," Cross acknowledged. "But I don't know why the voters would reward the Democrats [in Springfield] with more members." Amen.
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Message to the Illinois General Assembly---Pass the Capital Bill!
Indecision In Springfield Puts $9B In Federal Funds At Risk
CHICAGO (WBBM) -- On the eve of the General Assemby's special session in Springfield, two prominent Illinoisans who helped draft a 31 billion dollar capital spending plan are pleading for its passage.
WBBM's Regine Schlesinger reports that otherwise, Illinois stands to lose 9-billion dollars in federal money.
Governor Blagojevich enlisted former US House Speaker Denny Hastert and Southern Illinois University president Glenn Poshard to help write the infrastructure repair bill. The bill they came up with easily passed the Senate but stalled in the House.
Now, they're pleading for state representatives to pass it in the 2-day special session. Hastert says the political feud between the Governor and some of his fellow Democrats shouldn't get in the way.
The spending plan would be funded by building a new Chicago casino, expanding gambling and leasing the Illinois lottery. Poshard and Hastert warn that if lawmakers don't approve their bill, Illinois will lose 9 billion dollars in federal money for transportation, highways and other vital needs.
CHICAGO (WBBM) -- On the eve of the General Assemby's special session in Springfield, two prominent Illinoisans who helped draft a 31 billion dollar capital spending plan are pleading for its passage.
WBBM's Regine Schlesinger reports that otherwise, Illinois stands to lose 9-billion dollars in federal money.
Governor Blagojevich enlisted former US House Speaker Denny Hastert and Southern Illinois University president Glenn Poshard to help write the infrastructure repair bill. The bill they came up with easily passed the Senate but stalled in the House.
Now, they're pleading for state representatives to pass it in the 2-day special session. Hastert says the political feud between the Governor and some of his fellow Democrats shouldn't get in the way.
The spending plan would be funded by building a new Chicago casino, expanding gambling and leasing the Illinois lottery. Poshard and Hastert warn that if lawmakers don't approve their bill, Illinois will lose 9 billion dollars in federal money for transportation, highways and other vital needs.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Illinois $42 Billion in Debt! What is Karen May's plan to Save Illinois?
See this interesting article from the Bond Buyer, an influential financial publication in the bond and investment world. Illinois has problems folks and the finance gurus are starting to notice. This will mean higher interest rates for the state and a possible downgrade in our bond rating. While incumbent State Rep Karen May arranges deck chairs on a sinking ship, what is the General Assembly doing to avert this crisis? I propose legislation to create an emergency pension oversight board of recognized pension and finance experts to make recommendations to the General Assembly. Raiding monies from the pension funds should be outlawed and we must pay our obligations on time and in full first before we spend money we don't have.
Illinois Governor Outlines Possible Cuts As Budget Stalemate Continues - June 25, 2008
Illinois Budget Imbroglio - June 3, 2008 CHICAGO - Two days into a new fiscal year without a budget in place, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich yesterday announced a two-day special session of the General Assembly for next week aimed at winning passage of revenue measures that would trim about $850 million from a $2 billion deficit in the $59 billion operating budget approved by lawmakers. "Yesterday we started another fiscal year without a state budget. Last week I told the General Assembly that I would not sign a budget bill with a $2 billion shortfall - Illinoisans must be able to trust that our checks will not bounce," he said at a news conference. The governor's action is aimed at the state House, as the Senate did approve a series of revenue-generating measures in May when they signed off on a spending plan. The House approved the spending side of the package, but did not vote on a $16 billion pension obligation bond issue, the transfer of various funds, and a capital budget that combined would have trimmed the deficit by more than $1 billion. Yesterday, the governor backed off his push for the pension bond issue and did not provide another idea for how to replace the $400 million it would have saved in the fiscal 2009 budget. Blagojevich called on the House to approve the Illinois Works capital budget that would free up about $320 million in the operating budget and the transfer of $530 million from various non-general fund accounts. The governor last week outlined a series of potential cuts as he urged the House to return on its own. Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan's spokesman Steve Brown said there's not sufficient support for the various measures to win passage. The already strained relationship between the two Democrats has grown only more hostile in recent months.Yesterday, Brown said Madigan would "go to Springfield next week" as requested by the governor, but added there was "no way of knowing what happens after that. "The special session is set for July 9 and 10th. The governor said if the House fails to approve the needed-revenue measures during the first day, he would issue a proclamation on the secondenacting the cuts. "I will not take those actions lightly, and will only act when it becomes abundantly clear that the House can't or won't act responsibly on its own," said Blagojevich. Without a budget in place, Comptroller Dan Hynes has warned that bill payment could be delayed along with employee paychecks. Because of a drafting error in the budget, about 39 capital projects are being idled, but the governor said that would be fixed during the session next week. Support is strong for a capital budget, but differences remain among lawmakers on how to pay for it. The proposed capital budget relies on about $7 billion from a partial leasing of the Illinois Lottery, $800 million in upfront funds from the issuance of new gaming licenses, $7.8 billion in new general obligation borrowing, and local and federal matching dollars.About $6.2 billion of the bonding would be repaid with recurring gaming expansion revenues and $1.6 billion from transportation-related taxes and fees. The state has lacked a major infusion of capital dollars since the $12 billion Illinois Works program approved in 1999 and congressional officials have warned that without new funding the state risks the loss of federal matching dollars. With support for the pension borrowing plan more tenuous in the House among both Democratic and Republican members, the governor yesterday dropped his push to win its passage. The proposal calls for the restructuring of the 50-year payment schedule approved in 1995, increasing future year payments while trimming about $400 million off the fiscal 2009 payment. The infusion into the pension system of the funds raised through a new pension borrowing would help bring the funded ratio of the system up to 75% from 62%.
The current unfunded liability is $42 billion. The governor has promoted the pension plan as one that would ultimately trim 12 years off the time needed to reach a 90% funded ratio. Blagojevich said the pension plan overall would result in a savings of $34 billion in contributions. Yesterday, Moody's Investors Service issued a special report saying it was monitoring the situation in four states - California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania - that have entered new fiscal years without a budget in place. The delay is not expected to impact debt service payments, but it does have the potential to disrupt the flow of a state's payment to vendors and employees, as well as to the cities, public universities and other municipalities that receive state funds. "Moody's views repeated delays, or those causing government shutdowns, as signs of political polarization, and for those reasons, the timing of state budget enactment can affect the ratings Moody's assigns to state issued general obligation bonds and other debt," analyst and author of the report Ted Hampton wrote.
Illinois Governor Outlines Possible Cuts As Budget Stalemate Continues - June 25, 2008
Illinois Budget Imbroglio - June 3, 2008 CHICAGO - Two days into a new fiscal year without a budget in place, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich yesterday announced a two-day special session of the General Assembly for next week aimed at winning passage of revenue measures that would trim about $850 million from a $2 billion deficit in the $59 billion operating budget approved by lawmakers. "Yesterday we started another fiscal year without a state budget. Last week I told the General Assembly that I would not sign a budget bill with a $2 billion shortfall - Illinoisans must be able to trust that our checks will not bounce," he said at a news conference. The governor's action is aimed at the state House, as the Senate did approve a series of revenue-generating measures in May when they signed off on a spending plan. The House approved the spending side of the package, but did not vote on a $16 billion pension obligation bond issue, the transfer of various funds, and a capital budget that combined would have trimmed the deficit by more than $1 billion. Yesterday, the governor backed off his push for the pension bond issue and did not provide another idea for how to replace the $400 million it would have saved in the fiscal 2009 budget. Blagojevich called on the House to approve the Illinois Works capital budget that would free up about $320 million in the operating budget and the transfer of $530 million from various non-general fund accounts. The governor last week outlined a series of potential cuts as he urged the House to return on its own. Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan's spokesman Steve Brown said there's not sufficient support for the various measures to win passage. The already strained relationship between the two Democrats has grown only more hostile in recent months.Yesterday, Brown said Madigan would "go to Springfield next week" as requested by the governor, but added there was "no way of knowing what happens after that. "The special session is set for July 9 and 10th. The governor said if the House fails to approve the needed-revenue measures during the first day, he would issue a proclamation on the secondenacting the cuts. "I will not take those actions lightly, and will only act when it becomes abundantly clear that the House can't or won't act responsibly on its own," said Blagojevich. Without a budget in place, Comptroller Dan Hynes has warned that bill payment could be delayed along with employee paychecks. Because of a drafting error in the budget, about 39 capital projects are being idled, but the governor said that would be fixed during the session next week. Support is strong for a capital budget, but differences remain among lawmakers on how to pay for it. The proposed capital budget relies on about $7 billion from a partial leasing of the Illinois Lottery, $800 million in upfront funds from the issuance of new gaming licenses, $7.8 billion in new general obligation borrowing, and local and federal matching dollars.About $6.2 billion of the bonding would be repaid with recurring gaming expansion revenues and $1.6 billion from transportation-related taxes and fees. The state has lacked a major infusion of capital dollars since the $12 billion Illinois Works program approved in 1999 and congressional officials have warned that without new funding the state risks the loss of federal matching dollars. With support for the pension borrowing plan more tenuous in the House among both Democratic and Republican members, the governor yesterday dropped his push to win its passage. The proposal calls for the restructuring of the 50-year payment schedule approved in 1995, increasing future year payments while trimming about $400 million off the fiscal 2009 payment. The infusion into the pension system of the funds raised through a new pension borrowing would help bring the funded ratio of the system up to 75% from 62%.
The current unfunded liability is $42 billion. The governor has promoted the pension plan as one that would ultimately trim 12 years off the time needed to reach a 90% funded ratio. Blagojevich said the pension plan overall would result in a savings of $34 billion in contributions. Yesterday, Moody's Investors Service issued a special report saying it was monitoring the situation in four states - California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania - that have entered new fiscal years without a budget in place. The delay is not expected to impact debt service payments, but it does have the potential to disrupt the flow of a state's payment to vendors and employees, as well as to the cities, public universities and other municipalities that receive state funds. "Moody's views repeated delays, or those causing government shutdowns, as signs of political polarization, and for those reasons, the timing of state budget enactment can affect the ratings Moody's assigns to state issued general obligation bonds and other debt," analyst and author of the report Ted Hampton wrote.
Back to Springfield for the General Assembly
The GA's failure to come up with a balanced budget has resulted in the start of a second straight fiscal year without a state budget. The Governor today has ordered lawmakers back to Springfield to work on a budget. The Democrats can't work together and all have pet projects so we'll see how long this special session lasts. Given all the infighting last year I think it is safe to say they will be in Springfield a long, long time.
Governor calls lawmakers back to Springfield
Posted by David Mendell at 12:35 p.m.
Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Wednesday called state lawmakers back to Springfield for a session next week to make changes to a state budget that he has so far refused to sign.
Blagojevich is trying to take political advantage of the House and Senate decision to send him a budget that may be $2 billion out of balance.
The governor called the special session for the House and Senate for July 9 and 10. But he is clearly aiming his pressure at House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago).
Madigan's House Democrats have refused to pass legislation that Blagojevich wants. That includes selling $16 billion in bonds to shore up pension plans and free up spending pressure in the new fiscal year that started July 1. He also wants them to pass a multi-billion dollar public works program.
Unlike 2007's yearlong budget impasse, this spring the House and Senate Democrats joined together to pass the shaky budget. But the House refused to go along with the Senate on a variety of proposals to help cover the proposed spending.
Madigan has said the governor should use his amendatory veto power to cut the budget if he thinks there is not enough revenue for it. Blagojevich does not want to take the political pain that would come from making huge spending cuts
Governor calls lawmakers back to Springfield
Posted by David Mendell at 12:35 p.m.
Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Wednesday called state lawmakers back to Springfield for a session next week to make changes to a state budget that he has so far refused to sign.
Blagojevich is trying to take political advantage of the House and Senate decision to send him a budget that may be $2 billion out of balance.
The governor called the special session for the House and Senate for July 9 and 10. But he is clearly aiming his pressure at House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago).
Madigan's House Democrats have refused to pass legislation that Blagojevich wants. That includes selling $16 billion in bonds to shore up pension plans and free up spending pressure in the new fiscal year that started July 1. He also wants them to pass a multi-billion dollar public works program.
Unlike 2007's yearlong budget impasse, this spring the House and Senate Democrats joined together to pass the shaky budget. But the House refused to go along with the Senate on a variety of proposals to help cover the proposed spending.
Madigan has said the governor should use his amendatory veto power to cut the budget if he thinks there is not enough revenue for it. Blagojevich does not want to take the political pain that would come from making huge spending cuts
Friday, June 27, 2008
Blame the Democrats
Editorial from the Joliet paper...
Joliet Herald
June 8, 2008
Next time you drive over a pothole-filled road or become upset that your child is in an overcrowded classroom, think of the Illinois House Democrats and especially their "leader," House Speaker Michael Madigan.
In an amazing display of political idiocy, the House Democrats have failed to show any backbone to pass a $34 billion capital bill. That bill would have funded roads, bridges and schools, including $149 million for school construction in the Joliet Grade School District. Why did the House members choose a path of inactivity?
Because they were concerned that Gov. Rod Blagojevich might have too much power in deciding where the funds come from and where they will go.
In other words, the Democratic governor isn't trusted by many House Democrats, and because of this "mistrust," money won't be available on the innumerable projects that are so desperately needed.
Ironically, many of these same House Democrats had no problem giving former Republican governor and current federal inmate George Ryan free rein to spend in his $12 billion Illinois FIRST program, which was funded by higher license plate stickers and a raise in liquor taxes. Ryan gave $5.5 million for an ice arena in his hometown of Kankakee and used FIRST money to pay for an Italian-American Sports Hall of Fame. No House Democrats voiced concerns about Ryan's handouts.
But now the Democrats have a problem with Blagojevich. What's obvious is this problem is rooted in the inability of House Democrats to work for the people and instead cater to the petty interests of the misguided, bitter House Speaker who is having another of his endlessly exasperating and childish standoffs with the governor.
Republicans, led by House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego, see the Democrats' inaction as unacceptable, and we agree.
"Do they trust him or not?" Cross said of the House Democrats' attitude toward the governor. "The fact that we don't like someone is not an excuse for not getting our work done."
Cross crystallizes our view. The Democratic-controlled Senate found the capital plan acceptable, including funding the bill by leasing the state lottery and expanding gambling.
Lawmakers haven't passed a new statewide construction program in nine years. And it appears that House Democrats are going extend the wait until at least the November veto session.
It's very clear. If you want road repairs, school additions and construction, then contact the House Democrats. They must decide whether to serve the people's interests or continue blindly following Madigan.
Joliet Herald
June 8, 2008
Next time you drive over a pothole-filled road or become upset that your child is in an overcrowded classroom, think of the Illinois House Democrats and especially their "leader," House Speaker Michael Madigan.
In an amazing display of political idiocy, the House Democrats have failed to show any backbone to pass a $34 billion capital bill. That bill would have funded roads, bridges and schools, including $149 million for school construction in the Joliet Grade School District. Why did the House members choose a path of inactivity?
Because they were concerned that Gov. Rod Blagojevich might have too much power in deciding where the funds come from and where they will go.
In other words, the Democratic governor isn't trusted by many House Democrats, and because of this "mistrust," money won't be available on the innumerable projects that are so desperately needed.
Ironically, many of these same House Democrats had no problem giving former Republican governor and current federal inmate George Ryan free rein to spend in his $12 billion Illinois FIRST program, which was funded by higher license plate stickers and a raise in liquor taxes. Ryan gave $5.5 million for an ice arena in his hometown of Kankakee and used FIRST money to pay for an Italian-American Sports Hall of Fame. No House Democrats voiced concerns about Ryan's handouts.
But now the Democrats have a problem with Blagojevich. What's obvious is this problem is rooted in the inability of House Democrats to work for the people and instead cater to the petty interests of the misguided, bitter House Speaker who is having another of his endlessly exasperating and childish standoffs with the governor.
Republicans, led by House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego, see the Democrats' inaction as unacceptable, and we agree.
"Do they trust him or not?" Cross said of the House Democrats' attitude toward the governor. "The fact that we don't like someone is not an excuse for not getting our work done."
Cross crystallizes our view. The Democratic-controlled Senate found the capital plan acceptable, including funding the bill by leasing the state lottery and expanding gambling.
Lawmakers haven't passed a new statewide construction program in nine years. And it appears that House Democrats are going extend the wait until at least the November veto session.
It's very clear. If you want road repairs, school additions and construction, then contact the House Democrats. They must decide whether to serve the people's interests or continue blindly following Madigan.
Monday, June 23, 2008
New Poll Shows Illinois Voters Ready for Change
Poll shows deep level of distrust in Illinois government
6/20/2008
Kathleen Haughney, St. Louis Post Dispatch
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois politicians have been largely mired in scandal and controversy the past few years, and voters are tired of it, according to a recent poll.
Former Gov. George Ryan was sent to prison last fall on conspiracy and fraud charges. A top fundraiser for Gov. Rod Blagojevich was recently convicted for using his political influence to squeeze bribes from contractors seeking business with the state. And political infighting between lawmakers and Blagojevich has stopped a state infrastructure plan and balanced budget from materializing so far this year.
It's a problem that seems unlikely to yield a quick solution, and according to a recent poll by political reform coalition Midwest Democracy Network, voters aren't happy about it.
The poll, which surveyed 402 Illinoisans and had a margin of error of 4.9 percentage points, gave Blagojevich a 13 percent approval rating and the legislature a 17 percent rating.
"If any of us only had a 17 percent approval rating, we'd lose our jobs," said Cynthia Canary, director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform and a spokeswoman for Midwest Democracy Network.
The poll was conducted from April 21 through May 4, during the highly publicized trial of Blagojevich fundraiser Tony Rezko, who was convicted.
According to the poll, 3 percent of those polled "almost always" trust the government to do what is right, down from 7 percent in 2006. Meanwhile, 25 percent of respondents said they "almost never" trust the government, up from 14 percent in 2006.
Canary said voters are always grumbling about politicians, but recent years have been particularly bad in Illinois.
"In Illinois, in many ways this does stem back to the conviction of Gov. Ryan and the sense that our former governor went to jail and the response of our current governor and Legislature was nothing," she said. "They did nothing. They made no changes."
Brian Williamsen, a spokesman for Gov. Rod Blagojevich, said many voters are upset because of high prices at the pump, grocery stores and elsewhere. However, he added that the governor would not base any future decisions on public opinion polls that could swing up or down at any time.
"One thing that is pretty clear — times are rough, people are not pleased with the political games and the lack of action that they are seeing from their leaders, and really who can blame them," he said.
6/20/2008
Kathleen Haughney, St. Louis Post Dispatch
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois politicians have been largely mired in scandal and controversy the past few years, and voters are tired of it, according to a recent poll.
Former Gov. George Ryan was sent to prison last fall on conspiracy and fraud charges. A top fundraiser for Gov. Rod Blagojevich was recently convicted for using his political influence to squeeze bribes from contractors seeking business with the state. And political infighting between lawmakers and Blagojevich has stopped a state infrastructure plan and balanced budget from materializing so far this year.
It's a problem that seems unlikely to yield a quick solution, and according to a recent poll by political reform coalition Midwest Democracy Network, voters aren't happy about it.
The poll, which surveyed 402 Illinoisans and had a margin of error of 4.9 percentage points, gave Blagojevich a 13 percent approval rating and the legislature a 17 percent rating.
"If any of us only had a 17 percent approval rating, we'd lose our jobs," said Cynthia Canary, director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform and a spokeswoman for Midwest Democracy Network.
The poll was conducted from April 21 through May 4, during the highly publicized trial of Blagojevich fundraiser Tony Rezko, who was convicted.
According to the poll, 3 percent of those polled "almost always" trust the government to do what is right, down from 7 percent in 2006. Meanwhile, 25 percent of respondents said they "almost never" trust the government, up from 14 percent in 2006.
Canary said voters are always grumbling about politicians, but recent years have been particularly bad in Illinois.
"In Illinois, in many ways this does stem back to the conviction of Gov. Ryan and the sense that our former governor went to jail and the response of our current governor and Legislature was nothing," she said. "They did nothing. They made no changes."
Brian Williamsen, a spokesman for Gov. Rod Blagojevich, said many voters are upset because of high prices at the pump, grocery stores and elsewhere. However, he added that the governor would not base any future decisions on public opinion polls that could swing up or down at any time.
"One thing that is pretty clear — times are rough, people are not pleased with the political games and the lack of action that they are seeing from their leaders, and really who can blame them," he said.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Excellent Article in Sun-Times about the Dangers of One Party Rule and Their Advice to Vote Republican!
June 17, 2008
Just Say No To Incompetent Government
Chicago Sun-Times
How to say 'no' to incompetent government
June 17, 2008
Recommend (1)
STEVE HUNTLEY shuntley.cst@gmail.com
Voting matters. Sometimes folks find that out the hard way. That unhappy lot would include Cook County suburbanites jousting at windmills in their uphill campaign to secede from the county.
Two years ago these suburban residents probably didn't think it much mattered who ran county government -- only half of the registered voters cast ballots in the election that made Todd Stroger Cook County Board president. He rewarded their indifference with a big 1 percentage-point increase in the county sales tax. That will bring in more than enough money to cover a current budget shortfall -- enough to ensure more spend-thrift business-as-usual in county government for years. Now, despite the secession dreams of Palatine and a few other suburbs, voters have little choice but to wait until the 2010 elections to register their displeasure with Stroger.
Similarly, Illinois voters disillusioned by the incompetency of government under Gov. Blagojevich and disgusted by its corruption have to wait until 2010 in hopes of replacing him. A recall movement died in the state Senate. Impeachment is on the table, but as columnist Rich Miller wrote last week, House Speaker Michael Madigan is using that issue to try to win Republican seats and pad his majority. Although Blagojevich shoulders the lion's share of the blame for the breakdown of state government, he is not solely responsible. Madigan and Senate President Emil Jones have had a hand in the mess that Democratic one-party rule brings to Illinois.
But voters don't have to wait until 2010 to voice their dissatisfaction with that. They can vent in the balloting for the seats in the Illinois General Assembly at stake in the November elections.
Their watchword should be: Just say no to one-party rule.
That means voting Republican.
Yes, that's a hard sell in this blue state. With Barack Obama heading their ticket, Democrats are salivating over their prospects. The GOP brand nationally is in trouble. Many voters remember the corruption that sent former GOP Gov. George Ryan to prison. Still, those have to be weighed against a Democratic vote that is, in effect, a vote of confidence in a one-party stranglehold in Springfield, its petty bickering, poisonous feuds and incompetence.
The state Republican Party could do its part by coming up with a campaign to persuade voters that it is worthy of their trust. The Illinois GOP might take a page from Newt Gingrich's strategy in capturing the U.S. House of Representatives in 1994. His masterstroke was the "Contract with America," a simple and short list of goals that the Republicans would work to achieve if they gained control of the Congress. National Democrats stole the idea two years ago with their "six for '06" agenda of six goals if they retook the Congress, which they did.
Republicans need something like a five-item "Contract with Illinois" and a comprehensive media campaign to sell it to the voters. It should be clear-sighted and confined to bread-and-butter issues like jobs, taxes, health care, pension reform and ethics reform.
A media campaign would be expensive. Maybe one or more of the wealthy Republicans contemplating running for governor in 2010 could help out. After all, a successful wooing of voters to the idea of a stronger GOP role in Springfield could only help their chances two years down the road, just as Obama's change theme is riding the Democratic tide of 2006.
Sure, some worthy Democratic lawmakers might be lost. But Springfield is run by the party generals, not the field soldiers.
A GOP takeover in the Legislature likely isn't in the cards (especially as just 40 of the 59 Senate seats are in play). But just cutting into the big majorities of foot soldiers would tell the irresponsible generals Blagojevich, Madigan and Jones that the voters are mad as hell and aren't going to take it any more. It also might boost impeachment prospects. Voting matters.
Just Say No To Incompetent Government
Chicago Sun-Times
How to say 'no' to incompetent government
June 17, 2008
Recommend (1)
STEVE HUNTLEY shuntley.cst@gmail.com
Voting matters. Sometimes folks find that out the hard way. That unhappy lot would include Cook County suburbanites jousting at windmills in their uphill campaign to secede from the county.
Two years ago these suburban residents probably didn't think it much mattered who ran county government -- only half of the registered voters cast ballots in the election that made Todd Stroger Cook County Board president. He rewarded their indifference with a big 1 percentage-point increase in the county sales tax. That will bring in more than enough money to cover a current budget shortfall -- enough to ensure more spend-thrift business-as-usual in county government for years. Now, despite the secession dreams of Palatine and a few other suburbs, voters have little choice but to wait until the 2010 elections to register their displeasure with Stroger.
Similarly, Illinois voters disillusioned by the incompetency of government under Gov. Blagojevich and disgusted by its corruption have to wait until 2010 in hopes of replacing him. A recall movement died in the state Senate. Impeachment is on the table, but as columnist Rich Miller wrote last week, House Speaker Michael Madigan is using that issue to try to win Republican seats and pad his majority. Although Blagojevich shoulders the lion's share of the blame for the breakdown of state government, he is not solely responsible. Madigan and Senate President Emil Jones have had a hand in the mess that Democratic one-party rule brings to Illinois.
But voters don't have to wait until 2010 to voice their dissatisfaction with that. They can vent in the balloting for the seats in the Illinois General Assembly at stake in the November elections.
Their watchword should be: Just say no to one-party rule.
That means voting Republican.
Yes, that's a hard sell in this blue state. With Barack Obama heading their ticket, Democrats are salivating over their prospects. The GOP brand nationally is in trouble. Many voters remember the corruption that sent former GOP Gov. George Ryan to prison. Still, those have to be weighed against a Democratic vote that is, in effect, a vote of confidence in a one-party stranglehold in Springfield, its petty bickering, poisonous feuds and incompetence.
The state Republican Party could do its part by coming up with a campaign to persuade voters that it is worthy of their trust. The Illinois GOP might take a page from Newt Gingrich's strategy in capturing the U.S. House of Representatives in 1994. His masterstroke was the "Contract with America," a simple and short list of goals that the Republicans would work to achieve if they gained control of the Congress. National Democrats stole the idea two years ago with their "six for '06" agenda of six goals if they retook the Congress, which they did.
Republicans need something like a five-item "Contract with Illinois" and a comprehensive media campaign to sell it to the voters. It should be clear-sighted and confined to bread-and-butter issues like jobs, taxes, health care, pension reform and ethics reform.
A media campaign would be expensive. Maybe one or more of the wealthy Republicans contemplating running for governor in 2010 could help out. After all, a successful wooing of voters to the idea of a stronger GOP role in Springfield could only help their chances two years down the road, just as Obama's change theme is riding the Democratic tide of 2006.
Sure, some worthy Democratic lawmakers might be lost. But Springfield is run by the party generals, not the field soldiers.
A GOP takeover in the Legislature likely isn't in the cards (especially as just 40 of the 59 Senate seats are in play). But just cutting into the big majorities of foot soldiers would tell the irresponsible generals Blagojevich, Madigan and Jones that the voters are mad as hell and aren't going to take it any more. It also might boost impeachment prospects. Voting matters.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Daily Herald Blasts State Legislators for Failing to Enact Pension Reform
The Daily Herald took the State Legislature to task today for not proposing a solution to the state's runaway pension problem before they adjourned for summer vacation. This may be the single biggest issue facing the state and certainly has the biggest potential negative impact on our state's fiscal health. I will make pension reform a central part of my time in Springfield as your State Representative.
SPRINGFIELD -- State lawmakers had the incentive and the opportunity to work on the nation's worst pension debt problem, but they left town last month without a new solution -- and with even more money problems because of their inaction.
Here are some questions and answers about the latest on state government pensions.
Q: What is the financial condition of the pension systems today?
A: Pretty sad. The five state systems have a combined debt of about $44 billion, and they only have about 63 percent of the funding they'll eventually need to cover all their obligations to retirees. Those two factors combine to create the worst pension debt problem in the nation.
Q: Will any retirees be shorted this year?
A: No. The systems have enough cash and assets to cover their yearly obligations. State pensions will all be paid.
Q: Then what's the problem?
A: Debt -- costly, costly debt. The entire state budget is $59 billion, so $44 billion in long-term debt to the pension systems is a huge liability. The debt's growth rate is even scarier. The systems essentially are owed 8.5 percent interest every year their full costs aren't covered. That equates to more than $3.6 billion a year in interest -- or $120 a second.
Q: Did lawmakers do anything to deal with the problem this year?
A: Not to this point. Gov. Rod Blagojevich's administration and Senate Democrats wanted to issue $16 billion worth of pension bonds to pay down the debt. That would then free up money destined for pensions to be spent on other state budget needs: education, health care, etc.
Q: How would this pension bond work?
A: The governor and lawmakers did the same thing in 2003, only with $10 billion. The idea is to put that borrowed money into the pension systems to cut their debt and reduce interest costs. The Blagojevich administration hopes the bond debt would have an interest rate of less than 6 percent, compared to 8.5 percent for the pension debt, so the state would come out ahead.
Advocates say paying down the debt quickly and spending less in debt payments each year will save Illinois a whopping $55 billion by 2045. And they estimate it would cut this year's required payment to the pension systems from $800 million down to $300 million. The "leftover" $500 million would be directed to other spending needs.
Q: What happened with this idea?
A: The Senate approved it with only Democrat votes. Democratic Speaker Michael Madigan never called it for a vote in the House, where it needs some Republican votes to pass.
Q: What's behind the opposition?
A: Critics point to several problems. They say it's unwise to borrow more money to pay off existing debt, particularly when it means converting pension debt that can be paid off any time into bond debt with a strict payment schedule.
They argue it could be risky to invest such a large amount of money at a time when the stock market and economy is shaky. If the investments don't cover the costs of the extra borrowing, the pension debt problem would grow worse. They also protest spending the "leftover" $500 million on other needs when the pension systems are woefully underfunded.
Q: How long has this been a problem?
A: For decades. Lawmakers failed to put aside enough pension money for years. That added up over time, leading to the massive debt problem.
Q: What is the state doing about it?
A: There's a payment schedule that began in 1995 and is supposed to get the systems up to 90 percent funding over 50 years. But it was structured to require small payments in the early years and increasingly large payments later. As a result, the state is finding it harder and harder to make the required payments and has skipped them in some years.
Q: Where does all this leave the budget for the coming year?
A: Under state law, the pension systems automatically get an additional $800 million. But legislators approved a budget that assumes the pension bonds will be issued, cutting the payment. Since the bond plan failed, the budget will have a $500 million hole -- part of a deficit that, according to the governor's estimates, totals $2 billion.
Q: What will happen next?
A: Blagojevich could bring lawmakers back to town this summer to try to pass the pension bond and make other budget changes. Or the pension bond could be discussed again after the fall elections during the veto session.
SPRINGFIELD -- State lawmakers had the incentive and the opportunity to work on the nation's worst pension debt problem, but they left town last month without a new solution -- and with even more money problems because of their inaction.
Here are some questions and answers about the latest on state government pensions.
Q: What is the financial condition of the pension systems today?
A: Pretty sad. The five state systems have a combined debt of about $44 billion, and they only have about 63 percent of the funding they'll eventually need to cover all their obligations to retirees. Those two factors combine to create the worst pension debt problem in the nation.
Q: Will any retirees be shorted this year?
A: No. The systems have enough cash and assets to cover their yearly obligations. State pensions will all be paid.
Q: Then what's the problem?
A: Debt -- costly, costly debt. The entire state budget is $59 billion, so $44 billion in long-term debt to the pension systems is a huge liability. The debt's growth rate is even scarier. The systems essentially are owed 8.5 percent interest every year their full costs aren't covered. That equates to more than $3.6 billion a year in interest -- or $120 a second.
Q: Did lawmakers do anything to deal with the problem this year?
A: Not to this point. Gov. Rod Blagojevich's administration and Senate Democrats wanted to issue $16 billion worth of pension bonds to pay down the debt. That would then free up money destined for pensions to be spent on other state budget needs: education, health care, etc.
Q: How would this pension bond work?
A: The governor and lawmakers did the same thing in 2003, only with $10 billion. The idea is to put that borrowed money into the pension systems to cut their debt and reduce interest costs. The Blagojevich administration hopes the bond debt would have an interest rate of less than 6 percent, compared to 8.5 percent for the pension debt, so the state would come out ahead.
Advocates say paying down the debt quickly and spending less in debt payments each year will save Illinois a whopping $55 billion by 2045. And they estimate it would cut this year's required payment to the pension systems from $800 million down to $300 million. The "leftover" $500 million would be directed to other spending needs.
Q: What happened with this idea?
A: The Senate approved it with only Democrat votes. Democratic Speaker Michael Madigan never called it for a vote in the House, where it needs some Republican votes to pass.
Q: What's behind the opposition?
A: Critics point to several problems. They say it's unwise to borrow more money to pay off existing debt, particularly when it means converting pension debt that can be paid off any time into bond debt with a strict payment schedule.
They argue it could be risky to invest such a large amount of money at a time when the stock market and economy is shaky. If the investments don't cover the costs of the extra borrowing, the pension debt problem would grow worse. They also protest spending the "leftover" $500 million on other needs when the pension systems are woefully underfunded.
Q: How long has this been a problem?
A: For decades. Lawmakers failed to put aside enough pension money for years. That added up over time, leading to the massive debt problem.
Q: What is the state doing about it?
A: There's a payment schedule that began in 1995 and is supposed to get the systems up to 90 percent funding over 50 years. But it was structured to require small payments in the early years and increasingly large payments later. As a result, the state is finding it harder and harder to make the required payments and has skipped them in some years.
Q: Where does all this leave the budget for the coming year?
A: Under state law, the pension systems automatically get an additional $800 million. But legislators approved a budget that assumes the pension bonds will be issued, cutting the payment. Since the bond plan failed, the budget will have a $500 million hole -- part of a deficit that, according to the governor's estimates, totals $2 billion.
Q: What will happen next?
A: Blagojevich could bring lawmakers back to town this summer to try to pass the pension bond and make other budget changes. Or the pension bond could be discussed again after the fall elections during the veto session.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
House Democrats Playing Politics with Impeachment
This is an interesting development. For those of you who have not yet heard, Domcratic House Leader Mike Madigan's office authored a memo that contains talking points on impeaching the governor. I think many of us would agree that impeachment is something that should be on the table given the situation. However, reading the memo is an illustrative example of how the Democrat majority operates. It is filled with politics as usual and is certainly a brand of politics that Barack Obama would reject given his recent public statements! If you support impeachment or not you should be concerned with the pure political sleaze of the memo.
It is worth a read just for the interesting aspects of the memo. Any reasonable person would look at this and see the House Democrats as attempting to use impeachment talk against an unpopular governor to curry favor with the voters but while at the same time advising members of the house not to say that Madigan put them up to it. This is what I hate about our political system in Illinois and this is why I am running for office. Do what you say you will do--Say what you will do--and Stick to your word. C'mon, it's really not that hard guys.
Fallout continues in Illinois' 'Memo-Gate'
6/12/2008
Kevin McDermott, St. Louis Post Dispatch
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan has long been known around Springfield as "The Velvet Hammer" for his ability to quietly crush political adversaries.
But the velvet has slipped off the hammer this week.
Madigan is in a rare defensive position in his year-long tussle with Gov. Rod Blagojevich, after the airing of a secret memo from his staff directing legislative candidates to call for Blagojevich's impeachment — complete with instructions to deny that they're getting instructions.
The leaked memo may already have weakened Madigan's position in ongoing conflicts over state spending and other issues, with the Democratic governor's allies emboldened in their defense of him and even some Republicans taking his side.
"It's outrageous," state Rep. Kurt Granberg, D-Carlyle, said Wednesday of the Madigan memo. "It's very transparent now that this is just a personal vendetta" by Madigan against Blagojevich.
The episode has chipped at the aura of political infallibility that Madigan has long enjoyed.
"It was pretty heavy-handed and out of character … for someone who has a reputation of nothing happening by accident," said Kent Redfield, a political scientist at the University of Illinois at Springfield. "If the idea was to draw attention to the governor's problems, what it's ended up doing is drawing attention to this memo."
That was clear on Wednesday, as Blagojevich and other leaders met in Chicago on budget issues.
House Republican Leader Tom Cross, talking to reporters, accused Madigan of "a scheme to lie" to the public about his own involvement in anti-Blagojevich campaigns.
Senate President Emil Jones chided Madigan (who in addition to being House Speaker is the State Democratic Party Chairman) for going after a Democratic governor.
Madigan is the only leader who hasn't been at the recurrent budget meetings, sending surrogates and generally refusing to negotiate, Blagojevich says.
State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Collinsville, a top Blagojevich ally, suggested Wednesday that fallout from the memo gaffe might ultimately force Madigan to take a softer stance.
"Using a Democratic office to carry out his personal feud with a Democratic governor, to me, that's offensive," said Hoffman. "If that brings him to the realization he's got to stop these games, then it's a positive."
Madigan's office says the memo was merely a staff-written response to inquiries from numerous Democratic legislative candidates this year who asked Madigan's office how to respond to questions the media have been asking about whether Blagojevich should be impeached.
Madigan spokesman Steve Brown rejected the assertion by Hoffman and others that, as a top Democrat, Madigan had a duty to support Blagojevich.
"We're not going to fall over the cliff with these people," said Brown, who cited a widespread belief among the public that Blagojevich's administration is inept and perhaps corrupt. "If Mr. Hoffman thinks Democratic Party resources ought to be used to defend the schemes of this administration, he's whistling in the dark."
The 14-page memo — first revealed by The Associated Press on Tuesday — advises legislative candidates to call for Blagojevich's impeachment for myriad reasons, including the recent corruption conviction of his top fundraiser, Antoin "Tony" Rezko.
"Criminal activity in the Blagojevich administration is no longer theoretical — it is proven," the memo advises them to say.
Ultimately, the impeachment memo could have the ironic impact of making it less likely that Blagojevich actually faces impeachment — because his defenders certainly will point to the memo as evidence that such talk is merely a cynical political tool.
It is worth a read just for the interesting aspects of the memo. Any reasonable person would look at this and see the House Democrats as attempting to use impeachment talk against an unpopular governor to curry favor with the voters but while at the same time advising members of the house not to say that Madigan put them up to it. This is what I hate about our political system in Illinois and this is why I am running for office. Do what you say you will do--Say what you will do--and Stick to your word. C'mon, it's really not that hard guys.
Fallout continues in Illinois' 'Memo-Gate'
6/12/2008
Kevin McDermott, St. Louis Post Dispatch
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan has long been known around Springfield as "The Velvet Hammer" for his ability to quietly crush political adversaries.
But the velvet has slipped off the hammer this week.
Madigan is in a rare defensive position in his year-long tussle with Gov. Rod Blagojevich, after the airing of a secret memo from his staff directing legislative candidates to call for Blagojevich's impeachment — complete with instructions to deny that they're getting instructions.
The leaked memo may already have weakened Madigan's position in ongoing conflicts over state spending and other issues, with the Democratic governor's allies emboldened in their defense of him and even some Republicans taking his side.
"It's outrageous," state Rep. Kurt Granberg, D-Carlyle, said Wednesday of the Madigan memo. "It's very transparent now that this is just a personal vendetta" by Madigan against Blagojevich.
The episode has chipped at the aura of political infallibility that Madigan has long enjoyed.
"It was pretty heavy-handed and out of character … for someone who has a reputation of nothing happening by accident," said Kent Redfield, a political scientist at the University of Illinois at Springfield. "If the idea was to draw attention to the governor's problems, what it's ended up doing is drawing attention to this memo."
That was clear on Wednesday, as Blagojevich and other leaders met in Chicago on budget issues.
House Republican Leader Tom Cross, talking to reporters, accused Madigan of "a scheme to lie" to the public about his own involvement in anti-Blagojevich campaigns.
Senate President Emil Jones chided Madigan (who in addition to being House Speaker is the State Democratic Party Chairman) for going after a Democratic governor.
Madigan is the only leader who hasn't been at the recurrent budget meetings, sending surrogates and generally refusing to negotiate, Blagojevich says.
State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Collinsville, a top Blagojevich ally, suggested Wednesday that fallout from the memo gaffe might ultimately force Madigan to take a softer stance.
"Using a Democratic office to carry out his personal feud with a Democratic governor, to me, that's offensive," said Hoffman. "If that brings him to the realization he's got to stop these games, then it's a positive."
Madigan's office says the memo was merely a staff-written response to inquiries from numerous Democratic legislative candidates this year who asked Madigan's office how to respond to questions the media have been asking about whether Blagojevich should be impeached.
Madigan spokesman Steve Brown rejected the assertion by Hoffman and others that, as a top Democrat, Madigan had a duty to support Blagojevich.
"We're not going to fall over the cliff with these people," said Brown, who cited a widespread belief among the public that Blagojevich's administration is inept and perhaps corrupt. "If Mr. Hoffman thinks Democratic Party resources ought to be used to defend the schemes of this administration, he's whistling in the dark."
The 14-page memo — first revealed by The Associated Press on Tuesday — advises legislative candidates to call for Blagojevich's impeachment for myriad reasons, including the recent corruption conviction of his top fundraiser, Antoin "Tony" Rezko.
"Criminal activity in the Blagojevich administration is no longer theoretical — it is proven," the memo advises them to say.
Ultimately, the impeachment memo could have the ironic impact of making it less likely that Blagojevich actually faces impeachment — because his defenders certainly will point to the memo as evidence that such talk is merely a cynical political tool.
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
House Republican Plan to Reform Illinois
The Illinois House Republicans have put forward a real agenda for change in Illinois. I embrace this agenda and look forward to working with other concerned legislators to implement these much needed bills to reform Illinois and get this state moving forward again. Check out more at my website: www.timforillinois.com
House Republican
“Agenda for Illinois”
Give us 6 days and we will change Illinois
House Republicans support an economic stimulus package to boost business productivity and individual purchasing power. Also critical to Illinois’ business climate is the need to begin a comprehensive capital program that would target resources to roads, school buildings, higher education facilities, state facilities, and mass transit, creating jobs and community prosperity.
· Negotiate a comprehensive capital plan that will reinvigorate Illinois’ economy and create jobs statewide.
· Introduce job-creating business incentives, such as (1) broadening the investment tax credit for businesses, (2) readopting the job training expense credit, (3) reinstating the entire research & development income tax credit.
Real tax relief for Illinois families and seniors
Senior Property Tax Relief
· Reduce the of property taxes on seniors by:
i. exempting Social Security income from the definition of income assessment freeze eligibility purposes;
ii. decreasing the age limit from 65 to 55 to qualify for the senior citizens’ assessment freeze;
iii. increasing the “ceiling” level of income needed to qualify for the assessment freeze;
iv. expanding the senior citizens’ Homestead Exemption from $4,000 to $5,500; and
v. indexing the Homestead Exemption and the assessment freeze to the inflation rate. (All in HB 4916)
Property Tax Relief for Families
· Double the Income Tax Credit for property taxes paid from 5% to 10%.
Reducing the cost of gas in Illinois
· Suspend the State sales tax on motor fuel for a 4.5 month period. (HB 6318)
Creating a sales tax holiday
· Authorize a one-time sales tax holiday to provide consumer tax relief and encourage consumer spending. (HB 6319)
Require a “real” balanced budget be approved
· Prohibit unpaid obligations of the State from being transferred from one fiscal year to the next, thereby ensuring a true “balanced” budget.
· Require the State to establish a single, updated, searchable database website accessible to the public at no cost that includes each entity that receives Illinois funding.
· Provide “sunshine” to the budgeting process by requiring defined, minimum time periods a budget bill must be made available for inspection and scrutiny by legislators, the public, and the media.
Safe families. Safe communities.
Technology in the 21st century is easy to access and, more importantly, dangerous for our youth when used without supervision. Social networking sites have become popular venues for child predators, House Republicans are pushing for (1) more child protections and parental control when youth access social networking sites and (2) tougher penalties for individuals who prey on children.
Educating parents how to protect children using the Internet
· Require owners of social networking websites to obtain parental notification and enforce age requirements of minors. (HB 4874)
· Ban sex offender access to social networking websites.
(HB 4875)
Protecting families from domestic violence
· Provide for electronic surveillance of violators of orders of protections.
· Formally establish a violence surveillance program that requires police authorities to use specific monitoring equipment.
· Mandate intervention treatment as a remedy in every order of protection issued by the court. Make it a violation of a protective order for an abuser to not complete intervention treatment.
Restoring ethics to state government
Enhance Illinois ethics laws to (1) end pay-to-play tactics that have become all too pervasive in State government, and (2) bring sunshine to investment advisor and consultant fees, commissions, and expense reimbursements made to outside lobbyists or other consultants.
· Require individuals who lobby boards and commissions to register as lobbyists. (HB 5737)
· Prevent elected officials and other state appointees and employees from receiving fees related to legal, banking, and consulting work with state bonds.
(HB 1)
· Increase disclosures for investment advisors and consultants with work before a State board or commission. (SB 1305)
· Require bids for state contracts worth over $10,000 to disclose all political contributions over $500 made within the previous 2 years to the officeholder that will award the contract. (HB 1)
· Prohibit any entity, or affiliated entities or persons, with an aggregate total of more than $25,000 in state contracts from making political contributions to the officeholder that awards the contract. (HB 1)
Making higher education affordable
Affordability is a key element of college opportunity. Families want, and understand, that education and job training is important beyond high school. To keep higher education a reality for families, and to maintain the academic excellence of our institutions of higher learning, we must increase the State’s financial commitment to our universities and community colleges.
· Make higher education funding a budget priority.
· Increase student financial aid opportunities to a broader number of qualified students to help working families afford educational expenses.
House Republican
“Agenda for Illinois”
Give us 6 days and we will change Illinois
House Republicans support an economic stimulus package to boost business productivity and individual purchasing power. Also critical to Illinois’ business climate is the need to begin a comprehensive capital program that would target resources to roads, school buildings, higher education facilities, state facilities, and mass transit, creating jobs and community prosperity.
· Negotiate a comprehensive capital plan that will reinvigorate Illinois’ economy and create jobs statewide.
· Introduce job-creating business incentives, such as (1) broadening the investment tax credit for businesses, (2) readopting the job training expense credit, (3) reinstating the entire research & development income tax credit.
Real tax relief for Illinois families and seniors
Senior Property Tax Relief
· Reduce the of property taxes on seniors by:
i. exempting Social Security income from the definition of income assessment freeze eligibility purposes;
ii. decreasing the age limit from 65 to 55 to qualify for the senior citizens’ assessment freeze;
iii. increasing the “ceiling” level of income needed to qualify for the assessment freeze;
iv. expanding the senior citizens’ Homestead Exemption from $4,000 to $5,500; and
v. indexing the Homestead Exemption and the assessment freeze to the inflation rate. (All in HB 4916)
Property Tax Relief for Families
· Double the Income Tax Credit for property taxes paid from 5% to 10%.
Reducing the cost of gas in Illinois
· Suspend the State sales tax on motor fuel for a 4.5 month period. (HB 6318)
Creating a sales tax holiday
· Authorize a one-time sales tax holiday to provide consumer tax relief and encourage consumer spending. (HB 6319)
Require a “real” balanced budget be approved
· Prohibit unpaid obligations of the State from being transferred from one fiscal year to the next, thereby ensuring a true “balanced” budget.
· Require the State to establish a single, updated, searchable database website accessible to the public at no cost that includes each entity that receives Illinois funding.
· Provide “sunshine” to the budgeting process by requiring defined, minimum time periods a budget bill must be made available for inspection and scrutiny by legislators, the public, and the media.
Safe families. Safe communities.
Technology in the 21st century is easy to access and, more importantly, dangerous for our youth when used without supervision. Social networking sites have become popular venues for child predators, House Republicans are pushing for (1) more child protections and parental control when youth access social networking sites and (2) tougher penalties for individuals who prey on children.
Educating parents how to protect children using the Internet
· Require owners of social networking websites to obtain parental notification and enforce age requirements of minors. (HB 4874)
· Ban sex offender access to social networking websites.
(HB 4875)
Protecting families from domestic violence
· Provide for electronic surveillance of violators of orders of protections.
· Formally establish a violence surveillance program that requires police authorities to use specific monitoring equipment.
· Mandate intervention treatment as a remedy in every order of protection issued by the court. Make it a violation of a protective order for an abuser to not complete intervention treatment.
Restoring ethics to state government
Enhance Illinois ethics laws to (1) end pay-to-play tactics that have become all too pervasive in State government, and (2) bring sunshine to investment advisor and consultant fees, commissions, and expense reimbursements made to outside lobbyists or other consultants.
· Require individuals who lobby boards and commissions to register as lobbyists. (HB 5737)
· Prevent elected officials and other state appointees and employees from receiving fees related to legal, banking, and consulting work with state bonds.
(HB 1)
· Increase disclosures for investment advisors and consultants with work before a State board or commission. (SB 1305)
· Require bids for state contracts worth over $10,000 to disclose all political contributions over $500 made within the previous 2 years to the officeholder that will award the contract. (HB 1)
· Prohibit any entity, or affiliated entities or persons, with an aggregate total of more than $25,000 in state contracts from making political contributions to the officeholder that awards the contract. (HB 1)
Making higher education affordable
Affordability is a key element of college opportunity. Families want, and understand, that education and job training is important beyond high school. To keep higher education a reality for families, and to maintain the academic excellence of our institutions of higher learning, we must increase the State’s financial commitment to our universities and community colleges.
· Make higher education funding a budget priority.
· Increase student financial aid opportunities to a broader number of qualified students to help working families afford educational expenses.
Friday, May 30, 2008
U of I Economist Calles the Illinois Democrats Pension Borrowing Plan a Gimmick
This article underscores the need for real government pension reform in Illinois. The way to address the pension issues facing our state is to go back to a law the famed "Fab 5" freshmen legislators advocated back in the 1990's. The law, sponsored by then Illinois Senators Peter Fitzgerald and Steve Rauschenberger required the State to fully fund, on an annual basis, its pension liabilities. Governor Blagojevich and his allies suspended that law and declared "pension holidays" which allowed the state to skip payments. Now the liabilites are increasing and threaten to topple the system. We need a return to fiscal responsibility.
Economist contends pension Ill. debt plan merely 'gimmick'
5/30/2008
Kurt Erickson, Pantagraph
SPRINGFIELD — A University of Illinois economist says a pension borrowing plan pushed through the state Senate by Democrats Thursday is “nothing more than a book-keeping gimmick” that won’t solve the state’s long-term financial problems.
Jeffrey R. Brown, director of the U of I Center on Business and Public Policy, said the plan passes the burden of future pension debt to the next generation of taxpayers.
“It is a classic case of using smoke and mirrors to try to fool the public into thinking we have done something meaningful when we have not,” said Brown.
Democrats in the Senate want to borrow $16 billion to pay down the state’s pension debt. The move would free up about $500 million to help finance other parts of state government. It was approved in the Senate Thursday with no Republican support. It now heads to the House.
Brown, who has been nominated by President Bush to serve on the board of trustees for the nation’s Social Security and Medicare programs, says the move doesn’t lower the overall cost of state pensions.
The only way to address that is to raise taxes or reduce other government spending and direct that money to pay off pension debt, he said.
“Neither of these is attractive to politicians, particularly in an election year,” Brown said.
State Sen. Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, told senators that the move is financially solid.
“It’s a very conservative estimate,” Harmon said.
Economist contends pension Ill. debt plan merely 'gimmick'
5/30/2008
Kurt Erickson, Pantagraph
SPRINGFIELD — A University of Illinois economist says a pension borrowing plan pushed through the state Senate by Democrats Thursday is “nothing more than a book-keeping gimmick” that won’t solve the state’s long-term financial problems.
Jeffrey R. Brown, director of the U of I Center on Business and Public Policy, said the plan passes the burden of future pension debt to the next generation of taxpayers.
“It is a classic case of using smoke and mirrors to try to fool the public into thinking we have done something meaningful when we have not,” said Brown.
Democrats in the Senate want to borrow $16 billion to pay down the state’s pension debt. The move would free up about $500 million to help finance other parts of state government. It was approved in the Senate Thursday with no Republican support. It now heads to the House.
Brown, who has been nominated by President Bush to serve on the board of trustees for the nation’s Social Security and Medicare programs, says the move doesn’t lower the overall cost of state pensions.
The only way to address that is to raise taxes or reduce other government spending and direct that money to pay off pension debt, he said.
“Neither of these is attractive to politicians, particularly in an election year,” Brown said.
State Sen. Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, told senators that the move is financially solid.
“It’s a very conservative estimate,” Harmon said.
Great Editorial from the Daily Herald
Get fed up with our state officials
5/30/2008
Editorial, Daily Herald
We can't recall a time when there wasn't questionable spending in last-minute state budget and construction plans that never get publicly vetted.
Watch out. You might not realize it yet, but the next few days are very hazardous to all Illinoisans' financial health and well-being.
State legislative leaders and Gov. Rod Blagojevich suddenly are careening toward trying to approve a multibillion-dollar state budget and a $31 billion capital construction plan.
Democrats who control both the House and Senate face a midnight Saturday deadline to push through financial deals. If they don't, then super majority votes are required and Republicans gain more power at the bargaining table.
We've seen it all far too many times before. Months were wasted and now Democrats Blagojevich, Senate President Emil Jones and House Speaker Michael Madigan are trying to hammer out a back-door deal. Sadly, the game remains the same and the frustrating truth is that Illinoisans lose no matter the outcome.
If legislators ram budget or construction plans through both houses by midnight Saturday, we all lose because none of us or the rank-and-file legislators most of us elected will have much of a handle on any of the details.
If they don't, they have failed to do their jobs and the state's business is not being managed.
Last year, a Democratic draw prompted months of special sessions that cost nearly another $1 million out of our pockets. Any overtime session is going to cost taxpayers as more people spend more time in Springfield. This at a time when the state already isn't paying its bills on time.
It's unconscionable and we're all not complaining loudly enough.
Democratic and some Republican caucus chiefs are talking about a $31 billion construction program. While we have said before in this space that some construction money is needed, when something is slammed through in a weekend or in an overtime session, history shows there's bound to be reckless overspending on questionable projects we won't find out about until it's too late.
Remember Illinois FIRST? That mere $12 billion construction plan, approved nine years ago, included plenty of projects many saw as frivolous. The money didn't run out until 2003.
Right this second, Blagojevich and the caucus chiefs are talking about something more than twice that amount to be funded by borrowing money, selling off the rights to state lottery profits, adding slots at racetracks, and more and much bigger casinos in the region.
We can't recall a time when there wasn't questionable spending in last-minute state budget and construction plans that never get publicly vetted.
Whether a deal happens this weekend, or in weeks, it's more than likely our elected officials will have been reckless with our money.
And they wonder why so many of us want the power to recall them from office. It's all enough to make us sick.
5/30/2008
Editorial, Daily Herald
We can't recall a time when there wasn't questionable spending in last-minute state budget and construction plans that never get publicly vetted.
Watch out. You might not realize it yet, but the next few days are very hazardous to all Illinoisans' financial health and well-being.
State legislative leaders and Gov. Rod Blagojevich suddenly are careening toward trying to approve a multibillion-dollar state budget and a $31 billion capital construction plan.
Democrats who control both the House and Senate face a midnight Saturday deadline to push through financial deals. If they don't, then super majority votes are required and Republicans gain more power at the bargaining table.
We've seen it all far too many times before. Months were wasted and now Democrats Blagojevich, Senate President Emil Jones and House Speaker Michael Madigan are trying to hammer out a back-door deal. Sadly, the game remains the same and the frustrating truth is that Illinoisans lose no matter the outcome.
If legislators ram budget or construction plans through both houses by midnight Saturday, we all lose because none of us or the rank-and-file legislators most of us elected will have much of a handle on any of the details.
If they don't, they have failed to do their jobs and the state's business is not being managed.
Last year, a Democratic draw prompted months of special sessions that cost nearly another $1 million out of our pockets. Any overtime session is going to cost taxpayers as more people spend more time in Springfield. This at a time when the state already isn't paying its bills on time.
It's unconscionable and we're all not complaining loudly enough.
Democratic and some Republican caucus chiefs are talking about a $31 billion construction program. While we have said before in this space that some construction money is needed, when something is slammed through in a weekend or in an overtime session, history shows there's bound to be reckless overspending on questionable projects we won't find out about until it's too late.
Remember Illinois FIRST? That mere $12 billion construction plan, approved nine years ago, included plenty of projects many saw as frivolous. The money didn't run out until 2003.
Right this second, Blagojevich and the caucus chiefs are talking about something more than twice that amount to be funded by borrowing money, selling off the rights to state lottery profits, adding slots at racetracks, and more and much bigger casinos in the region.
We can't recall a time when there wasn't questionable spending in last-minute state budget and construction plans that never get publicly vetted.
Whether a deal happens this weekend, or in weeks, it's more than likely our elected officials will have been reckless with our money.
And they wonder why so many of us want the power to recall them from office. It's all enough to make us sick.
Monday, May 19, 2008
PRESS RELEASE FROM STRATTON CAMPAIGN
May 19, 2008 Contact: 312-505-3599
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE tim@timforillinois.com
TIM STRATTON CALLS FOR
IMMEDIATE GAS TAX RELIEF
TIM STRATTON URGE REP KAREN MAY TO SUPPORT GAS TAX RELIEF MEASURE THIS TUESDAY
Glencoe.…With gas prices rising past $4 per gallon and expected to approach $5 per gallon this summer, Republican candidate for State Representative Tim Stratton is calling on legislators to support an immediate suspension of the state sales tax on gasoline that is to be voted on this Tuesday by the Illinois House of Representatives. According to Stratton, suspension of the sales tax on gasoline purchases would provide immediate relief to consumers by reducing the cost per gallon by at least 17 cents.
“Nothing impacts a family budget more than the rising cost of gasoline,” said Stratton, candidate for State Representative for the 58th District. “Illinois’ high gas prices not only affect families at the pump, it has a chilling effect on the whole economy. Illinois families need relief and they need it now,” said Stratton.
According the AAA fuel gauge, gas per gallon is averaging $4.05 per gallon in the Chicago area. Just one month ago, the average cost per gallon was $3.65.
“Saving families $20 to $30 dollars per month makes a big difference for their budgets and is real money to families already stretched thin,” said Stratton
Stratton supports a House Republican initiative (House Bill 6318) that would suspend the state portion of state gas sales tax immediately through September 15th.
A similar measure was enacted in 2000 by the General Assembly and produced results for Illinois consumers by immediately reducing the cost of gas, according to the AAA (see attached).
House Republican Leader Tom Cross has said the Republicans will move to call the sales tax suspension initiative on Tuesday. On April 9th, House Republicans attempted to call the initiative for a vote, but Democrats used a parliamentary procedure to block the vote. Representative Karen May voted with the Democrat majority on that date to block a vote to suspend the sales tax on gasoline.
“Since Representative May last voted against gas tax relief, prices have risen over 50 cents per gallon,” said Stratton. “I hope she changes her position…again.”
“Since being elected, Representative May has seen her pay increase, she’s passed a budget that is over $1.5 billion in the red and she’s voted against gas tax relief,” said Stratton. "Just last week May voted to increase her pay again. “Now is the time for Representative May to stand with working families, or at least get out of the way.”
On Tuesday, May 20th, House Republicans will move to discharge House Bill 6318 from the Democrat controlled Rules Committee. If approved by the House, the suspension of the state sales tax on gasoline would begin immediately following approval by the Senate and Governor.
####
In 2000, Suspension Of The Sales Tax On Gasoline Worked…
And It Will Again
In 2000, Gas Prices Suddenly Dropped Between 8 And 10 Cents A Gallon Overnight When The Tax Suspension Went Into Effect. “When the tax suspension went into effect July 1, the change in price was obvious, as prices suddenly dropped between 8 and 10 cents a gallon overnight.” (Karen Mellen and Ray Long, “As Gasoline Prices Drop, Tax Debate Continues,” Chicago Tribune, 7/20/00)
AAA Attributed Part Of The Decline In Gas Prices To Illinois’ Temporary Suspension Of Its Gas Tax. “The price of gasoline in Illinois dropped 40 cents since its peak this summer, according to the latest survey Wednesday, a record decrease for one month. … The AAA credited both states [Illinois and Indiana] for temporarily suspending their five percent sales tax on gasoline, and on an increased supply of cleaner-burning reformulated gas.” (Robert McCoppin, “State Gas Prices Set Record One-Month Decline,” Chicago Daily Herald, 7/19/00)
• AAA Chicago Motor Club’s Steve Nolan: “The Temporary Repeal Of The State Gas Tax Has Helped [With Gas Price Drop]…” (Robert Manor, “Illinois Finds Dramatic Relief At Gas Pump,” Chicago Tribune, 8/17/00)
The Decline In Gas Prices Was “Aided By The Suspension July 1 [2000] Of The State’s 5 Percent Sales Tax on Gasoline.” “State legislators had called for the hearings as pump prices soared well above $2 a gallon. The recent decline-aided by the suspension July 1 of the state's 5 percent sales tax on gasoline-took some of the political expediency out of the hearings.” (Courtney Challos, “Legislators Now Irked Over Falling Gas Prices,” Chicago Tribune, 7/13/00)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE tim@timforillinois.com
TIM STRATTON CALLS FOR
IMMEDIATE GAS TAX RELIEF
TIM STRATTON URGE REP KAREN MAY TO SUPPORT GAS TAX RELIEF MEASURE THIS TUESDAY
Glencoe.…With gas prices rising past $4 per gallon and expected to approach $5 per gallon this summer, Republican candidate for State Representative Tim Stratton is calling on legislators to support an immediate suspension of the state sales tax on gasoline that is to be voted on this Tuesday by the Illinois House of Representatives. According to Stratton, suspension of the sales tax on gasoline purchases would provide immediate relief to consumers by reducing the cost per gallon by at least 17 cents.
“Nothing impacts a family budget more than the rising cost of gasoline,” said Stratton, candidate for State Representative for the 58th District. “Illinois’ high gas prices not only affect families at the pump, it has a chilling effect on the whole economy. Illinois families need relief and they need it now,” said Stratton.
According the AAA fuel gauge, gas per gallon is averaging $4.05 per gallon in the Chicago area. Just one month ago, the average cost per gallon was $3.65.
“Saving families $20 to $30 dollars per month makes a big difference for their budgets and is real money to families already stretched thin,” said Stratton
Stratton supports a House Republican initiative (House Bill 6318) that would suspend the state portion of state gas sales tax immediately through September 15th.
A similar measure was enacted in 2000 by the General Assembly and produced results for Illinois consumers by immediately reducing the cost of gas, according to the AAA (see attached).
House Republican Leader Tom Cross has said the Republicans will move to call the sales tax suspension initiative on Tuesday. On April 9th, House Republicans attempted to call the initiative for a vote, but Democrats used a parliamentary procedure to block the vote. Representative Karen May voted with the Democrat majority on that date to block a vote to suspend the sales tax on gasoline.
“Since Representative May last voted against gas tax relief, prices have risen over 50 cents per gallon,” said Stratton. “I hope she changes her position…again.”
“Since being elected, Representative May has seen her pay increase, she’s passed a budget that is over $1.5 billion in the red and she’s voted against gas tax relief,” said Stratton. "Just last week May voted to increase her pay again. “Now is the time for Representative May to stand with working families, or at least get out of the way.”
On Tuesday, May 20th, House Republicans will move to discharge House Bill 6318 from the Democrat controlled Rules Committee. If approved by the House, the suspension of the state sales tax on gasoline would begin immediately following approval by the Senate and Governor.
####
In 2000, Suspension Of The Sales Tax On Gasoline Worked…
And It Will Again
In 2000, Gas Prices Suddenly Dropped Between 8 And 10 Cents A Gallon Overnight When The Tax Suspension Went Into Effect. “When the tax suspension went into effect July 1, the change in price was obvious, as prices suddenly dropped between 8 and 10 cents a gallon overnight.” (Karen Mellen and Ray Long, “As Gasoline Prices Drop, Tax Debate Continues,” Chicago Tribune, 7/20/00)
AAA Attributed Part Of The Decline In Gas Prices To Illinois’ Temporary Suspension Of Its Gas Tax. “The price of gasoline in Illinois dropped 40 cents since its peak this summer, according to the latest survey Wednesday, a record decrease for one month. … The AAA credited both states [Illinois and Indiana] for temporarily suspending their five percent sales tax on gasoline, and on an increased supply of cleaner-burning reformulated gas.” (Robert McCoppin, “State Gas Prices Set Record One-Month Decline,” Chicago Daily Herald, 7/19/00)
• AAA Chicago Motor Club’s Steve Nolan: “The Temporary Repeal Of The State Gas Tax Has Helped [With Gas Price Drop]…” (Robert Manor, “Illinois Finds Dramatic Relief At Gas Pump,” Chicago Tribune, 8/17/00)
The Decline In Gas Prices Was “Aided By The Suspension July 1 [2000] Of The State’s 5 Percent Sales Tax on Gasoline.” “State legislators had called for the hearings as pump prices soared well above $2 a gallon. The recent decline-aided by the suspension July 1 of the state's 5 percent sales tax on gasoline-took some of the political expediency out of the hearings.” (Courtney Challos, “Legislators Now Irked Over Falling Gas Prices,” Chicago Tribune, 7/13/00)
Great Editorial From the Daily Herald
This is a good editorial from the Daily Herald. Also an interesting poll I found on the Capitol Fax Blog found that more Illinoisans thought Governor Ryan did a better job running the state than Governor Blagojevich is doing.
"Ask Illinois, a group that conducts automated polls, asked 2,301 registered voters this question last week: “If you were given the choice between former Gov. George Ryan and current Gov. Rod Blagojevich, which do you think would do a better job running our state?”
More than half, 52 percent, chose Ryan, the imprisoned former governor. Blagojevich scored 48 percent. The poll had a margin of error of plus/minus 2.19 percent.
You know things are bad when you’re losing a popularity contest to a federal inmate.
Legislators, governor, start talking now
5/16/2008
Editorial, Daily Herald
In less than two weeks' time, the Illinois General Assembly's spring session is supposed to close.
May 29th is the scheduled conclusion.
It's not happening.
By June 1, Democrats will have to have Republican votes to pass a budget.
Yet, there's no hint of any movement toward even setting up a meeting among the Democrats who control state government.
No hint that House Speaker Michael J. Madigan or Senate President Emil Jones or Gov. Rod Blagojevich ever even speak to one another.
And they wonder why so many voters want recall power and are outraged by talk of pay raises? We see little more than hot air coming out of the Capitol.
Illinois needs a state budget. The Associated Press reported a recent audit found more than $1 billion in Medicaid payments were being carried over into the next fiscal year to try to balance the books in this one.
Illinois also desperately needs a construction program. Blagojevich lined up former House Speaker Dennis Hastert and former Congressman Glenn Poshard to help build support and consensus for a construction program, but we see little evidence of either.
The governor suggested selling off the rights to state lottery sales to fund a $25 billion construction program. How about cutting spending and reprioritizing like so many families and businesses in Illinois have been forced to do in recent months? And then -- only after combing every budget for every dollar that can be saved -- looking at raising revenue? How about raising the cost of lottery tickets or raising fees on vehicles, vehicle titles or alcohol? How about some kind of minimum gambling expansion?
How about committing to coming up with a budget or construction program that has no pork? Or a capital improvement program tied to criteria based on highest need?
Someone start talking about something. Now.
A recent auditors' report noted 1,700 bridges were overdue for inspection, some for more than a year, and many already had been found to be "structurally deficient."
After this past crazy winter, many, many of our roads are in pathetic shape. A construction plan would put many Illinoisans to work who need it and save the rest of us from repeatedly having to spend money on costly car repairs.
As state Rep. Suzanne Bassi, a Rolling Meadows Republican, put it: "We have bridges in worse shape in Illinois than the one that caved in in Minnesota. So not to be addressing that is absolutely criminal."
We could not agree more.
We understand there is no trust and little love or respect among Blagojevich and the four legislative leaders.
But gentlemen, we don't care. This is serious business. There is no question lives and jobs are at stake. Maybe even yours.
You were elected to lead. Please. Quit posturing, step up, get in a room and start leading.
"Ask Illinois, a group that conducts automated polls, asked 2,301 registered voters this question last week: “If you were given the choice between former Gov. George Ryan and current Gov. Rod Blagojevich, which do you think would do a better job running our state?”
More than half, 52 percent, chose Ryan, the imprisoned former governor. Blagojevich scored 48 percent. The poll had a margin of error of plus/minus 2.19 percent.
You know things are bad when you’re losing a popularity contest to a federal inmate.
Legislators, governor, start talking now
5/16/2008
Editorial, Daily Herald
In less than two weeks' time, the Illinois General Assembly's spring session is supposed to close.
May 29th is the scheduled conclusion.
It's not happening.
By June 1, Democrats will have to have Republican votes to pass a budget.
Yet, there's no hint of any movement toward even setting up a meeting among the Democrats who control state government.
No hint that House Speaker Michael J. Madigan or Senate President Emil Jones or Gov. Rod Blagojevich ever even speak to one another.
And they wonder why so many voters want recall power and are outraged by talk of pay raises? We see little more than hot air coming out of the Capitol.
Illinois needs a state budget. The Associated Press reported a recent audit found more than $1 billion in Medicaid payments were being carried over into the next fiscal year to try to balance the books in this one.
Illinois also desperately needs a construction program. Blagojevich lined up former House Speaker Dennis Hastert and former Congressman Glenn Poshard to help build support and consensus for a construction program, but we see little evidence of either.
The governor suggested selling off the rights to state lottery sales to fund a $25 billion construction program. How about cutting spending and reprioritizing like so many families and businesses in Illinois have been forced to do in recent months? And then -- only after combing every budget for every dollar that can be saved -- looking at raising revenue? How about raising the cost of lottery tickets or raising fees on vehicles, vehicle titles or alcohol? How about some kind of minimum gambling expansion?
How about committing to coming up with a budget or construction program that has no pork? Or a capital improvement program tied to criteria based on highest need?
Someone start talking about something. Now.
A recent auditors' report noted 1,700 bridges were overdue for inspection, some for more than a year, and many already had been found to be "structurally deficient."
After this past crazy winter, many, many of our roads are in pathetic shape. A construction plan would put many Illinoisans to work who need it and save the rest of us from repeatedly having to spend money on costly car repairs.
As state Rep. Suzanne Bassi, a Rolling Meadows Republican, put it: "We have bridges in worse shape in Illinois than the one that caved in in Minnesota. So not to be addressing that is absolutely criminal."
We could not agree more.
We understand there is no trust and little love or respect among Blagojevich and the four legislative leaders.
But gentlemen, we don't care. This is serious business. There is no question lives and jobs are at stake. Maybe even yours.
You were elected to lead. Please. Quit posturing, step up, get in a room and start leading.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Illinois Audit Finds State Owes Massive Amounts of Back Medicaid Bills
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) - A new audit confirms Illinois has a severe backlog of overdue health care bills, but problems with the Medicaid system go much deeper.
Auditor General William Holland found that Illinois ended each of the last three years with an average of $1.5 billion in unpaid bills.
He also found the Department of Healthcare and Family Services did a poor job of handling the bills it did manage to pay.
There was no clear system for deciding who got paid first. The state held bills for nearly two months before even starting the process of paying them.
Illinois could owe up to $$81 million in interest on overdue bills.
The department says it will make improvements but defends many of its procedures.
Auditor General William Holland found that Illinois ended each of the last three years with an average of $1.5 billion in unpaid bills.
He also found the Department of Healthcare and Family Services did a poor job of handling the bills it did manage to pay.
There was no clear system for deciding who got paid first. The state held bills for nearly two months before even starting the process of paying them.
Illinois could owe up to $$81 million in interest on overdue bills.
The department says it will make improvements but defends many of its procedures.
Illinois Republicans "Get It"
Here is a compelling guest editorial from the Illinois Republican Chairman Andy McKenna that appeared in today's Chicago Tribune. The Illinois Republican Party understands that it let people down and has learned its lesson. The State is in worse shape now than it ever was under Republican leadership. The time for change is now. Join the new Republicans in making our state the best it can be.
TIME FOR CHANGE IN ILLINOIS
The people of Illinois have endured failed leadership at the very top of their government for nearly a decade. They trusted their leaders, and that trust has been violated time and again.
Last summer, the Republican Party went around the state to listen to voters. One idea we kept hearing: a recall amendment to keep political leaders honest. Out of those talks, some legislators started to seriously consider the idea.
As the Antoin "Tony" Rezko trial revealed more allegations of deep corruption in Gov. Rod Blagojevich's administration, we heard voters demanding the ability to recall public officials who violate the public trust. Unfortunately, not all legislators listened.
Senate Democrats protected Blagojevich by killing any chance of putting a recall amendment on the November ballot.
They chose Blagojevich over the people. And then to cap the day, Senate President Emil Jones, who led the fight against a recall amendment, declared he needed a pay raise.
This is the attitude voters seek to change in Springfield—an attitude of arrogance and entitlement, an attitude that ignores the wishes of the people, that protects a culture of corruption.
Six years ago, Illinois voters threw Republicans out of office in response to their failed leadership, arrogance and inability to listen to the wishes of the people. We were rightfully held accountable.
We listened. When the votes were tallied in the Senate, one group stood together in support of the recall amendment: Republicans.
Republicans believe it is time for ethics reform and a recall amendment. We believe it is time for tax and spending reform and greater transparency in government.
We believe it is time for change in Illinois.
—Andy McKenna
Chairman
Illinois Republican Party
TIME FOR CHANGE IN ILLINOIS
The people of Illinois have endured failed leadership at the very top of their government for nearly a decade. They trusted their leaders, and that trust has been violated time and again.
Last summer, the Republican Party went around the state to listen to voters. One idea we kept hearing: a recall amendment to keep political leaders honest. Out of those talks, some legislators started to seriously consider the idea.
As the Antoin "Tony" Rezko trial revealed more allegations of deep corruption in Gov. Rod Blagojevich's administration, we heard voters demanding the ability to recall public officials who violate the public trust. Unfortunately, not all legislators listened.
Senate Democrats protected Blagojevich by killing any chance of putting a recall amendment on the November ballot.
They chose Blagojevich over the people. And then to cap the day, Senate President Emil Jones, who led the fight against a recall amendment, declared he needed a pay raise.
This is the attitude voters seek to change in Springfield—an attitude of arrogance and entitlement, an attitude that ignores the wishes of the people, that protects a culture of corruption.
Six years ago, Illinois voters threw Republicans out of office in response to their failed leadership, arrogance and inability to listen to the wishes of the people. We were rightfully held accountable.
We listened. When the votes were tallied in the Senate, one group stood together in support of the recall amendment: Republicans.
Republicans believe it is time for ethics reform and a recall amendment. We believe it is time for tax and spending reform and greater transparency in government.
We believe it is time for change in Illinois.
—Andy McKenna
Chairman
Illinois Republican Party
Monday, May 12, 2008
Chicago Sun Times Editorial re Legislature and its Failures
Raise issue helps prove lawmakers don't deserve it
5/12/2008
Editorial, Chicago Sun-Times
You have to feel sorry for Illinois state lawmakers. They live in a world where you don't have to ask for a raise, you get it automatically, unless you say no.
And you get the raise -- a good one, too, consisting of a percentage hike plus a cost-of-living increase -- whether you do a good job or not.
Which is good for state lawmakers, since they are doing a miserable job. They have yet to even resolve the state's current budget woes, yet alone grapple with the next budget.
So you can imagine the shock that shot through some lawmakers when the possibility arose they may not get their pay raises this year.
Take Senate President Emil Jones, who has been repeating himself like Dustin Hoffman's Rain Man.
"I need a pay raise," Jones says. "I need a pay raise."
Or Sen. Rickey Hendon, who was so stunned when the House voted to reject the raise, that he mistook the Senate for a TV feature.
"They want to use the Senate and pimp us, and they keep taking the money," Hendon said of the House, in an explanation perfect for MTV's Choose or Lose.
Hendon also attacked a fellow state senator, Susan Garrett, who wants to reject the raise, calling her "filthy rich."
And just in case voters wondered where the filthy rich live, Hendon informed them, after consulting his Looney Tunes map:
"Richville."
Hendon asked Garrett to sign her expense check over to him.
In all seriousness, we have no problem with the principle of giving lawmakers pay raises, even in tight economic times. With these raises, lawmakers would be making from roughly $70,000 to more than $100,000 a year.
Good salaries are a way to attract good people to these jobs, which can demand long hours and hard work when done right.
But all this squabbling over a pay raise serves only to underscore the buffoonery that passes for the state legislative process these days.
State lawmakers should be required to actively vote themselves a pay raise -- up or down. Forget this nonsense of raises that kick in automatically unless they are voted down.
In the real world, a pay raise comes with a job well done.
Nobody in Springfield is doing any kind of a job.
5/12/2008
Editorial, Chicago Sun-Times
You have to feel sorry for Illinois state lawmakers. They live in a world where you don't have to ask for a raise, you get it automatically, unless you say no.
And you get the raise -- a good one, too, consisting of a percentage hike plus a cost-of-living increase -- whether you do a good job or not.
Which is good for state lawmakers, since they are doing a miserable job. They have yet to even resolve the state's current budget woes, yet alone grapple with the next budget.
So you can imagine the shock that shot through some lawmakers when the possibility arose they may not get their pay raises this year.
Take Senate President Emil Jones, who has been repeating himself like Dustin Hoffman's Rain Man.
"I need a pay raise," Jones says. "I need a pay raise."
Or Sen. Rickey Hendon, who was so stunned when the House voted to reject the raise, that he mistook the Senate for a TV feature.
"They want to use the Senate and pimp us, and they keep taking the money," Hendon said of the House, in an explanation perfect for MTV's Choose or Lose.
Hendon also attacked a fellow state senator, Susan Garrett, who wants to reject the raise, calling her "filthy rich."
And just in case voters wondered where the filthy rich live, Hendon informed them, after consulting his Looney Tunes map:
"Richville."
Hendon asked Garrett to sign her expense check over to him.
In all seriousness, we have no problem with the principle of giving lawmakers pay raises, even in tight economic times. With these raises, lawmakers would be making from roughly $70,000 to more than $100,000 a year.
Good salaries are a way to attract good people to these jobs, which can demand long hours and hard work when done right.
But all this squabbling over a pay raise serves only to underscore the buffoonery that passes for the state legislative process these days.
State lawmakers should be required to actively vote themselves a pay raise -- up or down. Forget this nonsense of raises that kick in automatically unless they are voted down.
In the real world, a pay raise comes with a job well done.
Nobody in Springfield is doing any kind of a job.
We want your money!!!
Is Emil Jones serious??? He is attacking Senator Susan Garrett who spoke out against the Democrats pay raise grab. My opponent, Representative Karen May voted IN FAVOR of the pay hike. She also suppored a 9% plus increase in her pay last year.
Not just 'filthy rich' who object to lawmakers' pay hike
5/12/2008
Editorial, Pantagraph
Senate President Emil Jones and Sen. Rickey Hendon might have been directing their caustic remarks at Sen. Susan Garrett for opposing a legislative pay increase.
But their comments were also insulting to taxpayers - particularly those struggling to make ends meet while their elected representatives are poised to receive their second double-digit percentage pay increase in two years.
All three are Democrats.
Hendon called Garrett of suburban Lake Forest the senator from "Richville."
He also said, "It just blows my mind how the filthy rich are always the ones saying we don't need the raise."
It's not just "the filthy rich" who are saying that, Sen. Hendon. Those opposing the 11.7 percent increase include taxpayers who make far less than the Legislature's base pay of $65,353 - along with a $125 per diem to cover their expenses each day they are in session.
Then there's Jones who quipped, "I've got to get me some food stamps," while walking near Garrett after the heated discussion on pay increases.
On top of his base pay, Jones receives an additional $26,471 for serving as Senate president. In other words, even without the raise, his salary is approaching six figures.
For Jones to joke that he needs food stamps without the raise shows arrogance and callousness toward people in his Chicago district and elsewhere in Illinois who need food stamps to feed their families and meet their basic needs.
Furthermore, most lawmakers will receive pensions their constituents can only dream of.
Although Jones and Hendon are full-time lawmakers, many of their colleagues have other jobs that supplement their pay.
While no one gets "rich" working strictly as a state lawmaker in Illinois, no one is heading to the poorhouse on those salaries.
The House voted 94-8 on Wednesday to reject the pay increases recommended by the Illinois Compensation Review Board. However, both chambers must vote to reject the increases in the same resolution in order to block them - and its questionable whether the matter will even come to a vote in the Senate, at least not with a "clean" bill.
Hendon is suggesting a different version that would muddy the political waters by barring any lawmaker who voted against a pay increase from receiving it if the pay increase eventually takes effect. That's ludicrous.
If the Senate approves Hendon's proposal or some different bill on which the House doesn't act, the raises will take effect and taxpayers will be left holding the bag -again.
Not just 'filthy rich' who object to lawmakers' pay hike
5/12/2008
Editorial, Pantagraph
Senate President Emil Jones and Sen. Rickey Hendon might have been directing their caustic remarks at Sen. Susan Garrett for opposing a legislative pay increase.
But their comments were also insulting to taxpayers - particularly those struggling to make ends meet while their elected representatives are poised to receive their second double-digit percentage pay increase in two years.
All three are Democrats.
Hendon called Garrett of suburban Lake Forest the senator from "Richville."
He also said, "It just blows my mind how the filthy rich are always the ones saying we don't need the raise."
It's not just "the filthy rich" who are saying that, Sen. Hendon. Those opposing the 11.7 percent increase include taxpayers who make far less than the Legislature's base pay of $65,353 - along with a $125 per diem to cover their expenses each day they are in session.
Then there's Jones who quipped, "I've got to get me some food stamps," while walking near Garrett after the heated discussion on pay increases.
On top of his base pay, Jones receives an additional $26,471 for serving as Senate president. In other words, even without the raise, his salary is approaching six figures.
For Jones to joke that he needs food stamps without the raise shows arrogance and callousness toward people in his Chicago district and elsewhere in Illinois who need food stamps to feed their families and meet their basic needs.
Furthermore, most lawmakers will receive pensions their constituents can only dream of.
Although Jones and Hendon are full-time lawmakers, many of their colleagues have other jobs that supplement their pay.
While no one gets "rich" working strictly as a state lawmaker in Illinois, no one is heading to the poorhouse on those salaries.
The House voted 94-8 on Wednesday to reject the pay increases recommended by the Illinois Compensation Review Board. However, both chambers must vote to reject the increases in the same resolution in order to block them - and its questionable whether the matter will even come to a vote in the Senate, at least not with a "clean" bill.
Hendon is suggesting a different version that would muddy the political waters by barring any lawmaker who voted against a pay increase from receiving it if the pay increase eventually takes effect. That's ludicrous.
If the Senate approves Hendon's proposal or some different bill on which the House doesn't act, the raises will take effect and taxpayers will be left holding the bag -again.
Non-partisan Watchdog Group Give Budget Solutions a Failing Grade
Watchdog barks at governor, assembly
Group: Proposed budget clashes with fiscal reality
By BERNARD SCHOENBURG
POLITICAL WRITER
Monday, May 12, 2008
The Civic Federation of Chicago, accusing Gov. Rod Blagojevich and the General Assembly of not facing the state’s fiscal crisis, is opposing new spending and borrowing proposals in the governor’s proposed budget, but backing across-the-board cuts and sweeping money from special-purpose funds to help the state live within its means.
The governor’s plans, the influential government watchdog group says, “do not adequately address the grim fiscal reality facing the state of Illinois.”
In an analysis released today of the operating budget proposed by Blagojevich for the next fiscal year, the influential government watchdog group also calls for state pension reforms, including a moratorium on new benefits, a 1 percent increase in employee pension contributions, and a more affordable retirement package — including a higher retirement age — for people hired by the state in the future.
“The Civic Federation opposes the state of Illinois FY2009 operating budget and urges dramatic recasting of the state’s financial priorities,” the report states.
“Governor (Rod) Blagojevich has proposed a $49.7 billion operating budget that includes $1.9 billion in new initiatives, $1 billion in new business taxes, $16 billion in new pension obligation debt, the lease of the state lottery in the form of a partial concession, and a massive $25 billion capital plan,” the report says.
The report says that the new programs for the fiscal year beginning July 1 are “unaffordable and imprudent during an economic downturn” and that the pension borrowing plan is not linked to reforms to eat into more than $44 billion in unfunded liabilities.
Selling off part of the lottery to fund a building program before specifying what projects should be funded provides “no basis to evaluate whether the plan adequately addresses the state’s most critical needs,” the federation says.
Blagojevich spending initiatives the federation opposes include a $300-per-child tax credit for qualifying families — a $900 million program the governor pushed in his February budget address as a state stimulus package. The group also opposes a $417 million expansion of the governor’s Illinois Covered health insurance plan.
The group also withdrew its earlier approval of a 1 percentage point increase in the state income tax.
“Until the State can clearly demonstrate its dedication to putting its fiscal house in order, the Civic Federation and the public will not be convinced that any new tax dollars will be well spent,” the report says.
The Civic Federation supports other Blagojevich budget ideas, including a 3 percent across-the-board cut in non-priority spending, which the federation said would cut personnel by 1,464, and moves to increase efficiency. It also supports “proposed special purpose funds sweeps and the governor’s efforts to consolidate special purpose funds into the General Fund when appropriate.”
While the report keys on the proposals made by Blagojevich in his combined State of the State and budget address in February, that address merely laid out his ideas. It remains up to the General Assembly to pass a budget.
The scheduled adjournment date of the General Assembly — and the date by which a budget for fiscal 2009 would be passed if all goes smoothly — is May 29. However, last year, several months of post-deadline wrangling were needed to fashion a budget, and this year, many lawmakers have again been skeptical of some of the governor’s proposals.
The Blagojevich administration responded to the report by saying the governor’s plan tries to meet the needs of people in the state.
“While we are pleased that the Civic Federation recognizes that we have taken steps to increase government efficiency, what their report fails to recognize is that there is a huge human aspect to what government does, especially when there is an economic downturn,” said Katie Ridgway, spokeswoman for the governor’s budget office.
“Being more efficient and saving money is important because it allows us to meet the needs of people — from creating jobs, to making sure that people have access to health insurance, ensuring that all kids have access to quality schools, and guaranteeing that our roads, bridges and other infrastructure is safe.
“We would like to hear the federation’s ideas on how the state can really help people during the national economic downturn,” Ridgway said.
Bernard Schoenburg can be reached at 788-1540.
Civic Federation positions in brief:
Opposes
*Selling lottery unless building program is spelled out
*$300 per child tax credit stimulus
*Expansion of Illinois Covered health insurance program
*State income tax increase until state puts its “fiscal house in order”
Supports
*State employee pension reforms, including higher retirement age
*Cuts in non-priority spending
*Special-purpose fund sweeps
The Civic Federation of Chicago
At 115 years old, the Civic Federation of Chicago, whose members include business and professional leaders from a wide range of Chicago-area institutions, is considered the oldest taxpayers’ research organization in the country.
The federation “is a non-partisan government research organization working to maximize the quality and cost-effectiveness of government services in the Chicago region,” the group says on its web site.
Group: Proposed budget clashes with fiscal reality
By BERNARD SCHOENBURG
POLITICAL WRITER
Monday, May 12, 2008
The Civic Federation of Chicago, accusing Gov. Rod Blagojevich and the General Assembly of not facing the state’s fiscal crisis, is opposing new spending and borrowing proposals in the governor’s proposed budget, but backing across-the-board cuts and sweeping money from special-purpose funds to help the state live within its means.
The governor’s plans, the influential government watchdog group says, “do not adequately address the grim fiscal reality facing the state of Illinois.”
In an analysis released today of the operating budget proposed by Blagojevich for the next fiscal year, the influential government watchdog group also calls for state pension reforms, including a moratorium on new benefits, a 1 percent increase in employee pension contributions, and a more affordable retirement package — including a higher retirement age — for people hired by the state in the future.
“The Civic Federation opposes the state of Illinois FY2009 operating budget and urges dramatic recasting of the state’s financial priorities,” the report states.
“Governor (Rod) Blagojevich has proposed a $49.7 billion operating budget that includes $1.9 billion in new initiatives, $1 billion in new business taxes, $16 billion in new pension obligation debt, the lease of the state lottery in the form of a partial concession, and a massive $25 billion capital plan,” the report says.
The report says that the new programs for the fiscal year beginning July 1 are “unaffordable and imprudent during an economic downturn” and that the pension borrowing plan is not linked to reforms to eat into more than $44 billion in unfunded liabilities.
Selling off part of the lottery to fund a building program before specifying what projects should be funded provides “no basis to evaluate whether the plan adequately addresses the state’s most critical needs,” the federation says.
Blagojevich spending initiatives the federation opposes include a $300-per-child tax credit for qualifying families — a $900 million program the governor pushed in his February budget address as a state stimulus package. The group also opposes a $417 million expansion of the governor’s Illinois Covered health insurance plan.
The group also withdrew its earlier approval of a 1 percentage point increase in the state income tax.
“Until the State can clearly demonstrate its dedication to putting its fiscal house in order, the Civic Federation and the public will not be convinced that any new tax dollars will be well spent,” the report says.
The Civic Federation supports other Blagojevich budget ideas, including a 3 percent across-the-board cut in non-priority spending, which the federation said would cut personnel by 1,464, and moves to increase efficiency. It also supports “proposed special purpose funds sweeps and the governor’s efforts to consolidate special purpose funds into the General Fund when appropriate.”
While the report keys on the proposals made by Blagojevich in his combined State of the State and budget address in February, that address merely laid out his ideas. It remains up to the General Assembly to pass a budget.
The scheduled adjournment date of the General Assembly — and the date by which a budget for fiscal 2009 would be passed if all goes smoothly — is May 29. However, last year, several months of post-deadline wrangling were needed to fashion a budget, and this year, many lawmakers have again been skeptical of some of the governor’s proposals.
The Blagojevich administration responded to the report by saying the governor’s plan tries to meet the needs of people in the state.
“While we are pleased that the Civic Federation recognizes that we have taken steps to increase government efficiency, what their report fails to recognize is that there is a huge human aspect to what government does, especially when there is an economic downturn,” said Katie Ridgway, spokeswoman for the governor’s budget office.
“Being more efficient and saving money is important because it allows us to meet the needs of people — from creating jobs, to making sure that people have access to health insurance, ensuring that all kids have access to quality schools, and guaranteeing that our roads, bridges and other infrastructure is safe.
“We would like to hear the federation’s ideas on how the state can really help people during the national economic downturn,” Ridgway said.
Bernard Schoenburg can be reached at 788-1540.
Civic Federation positions in brief:
Opposes
*Selling lottery unless building program is spelled out
*$300 per child tax credit stimulus
*Expansion of Illinois Covered health insurance program
*State income tax increase until state puts its “fiscal house in order”
Supports
*State employee pension reforms, including higher retirement age
*Cuts in non-priority spending
*Special-purpose fund sweeps
The Civic Federation of Chicago
At 115 years old, the Civic Federation of Chicago, whose members include business and professional leaders from a wide range of Chicago-area institutions, is considered the oldest taxpayers’ research organization in the country.
The federation “is a non-partisan government research organization working to maximize the quality and cost-effectiveness of government services in the Chicago region,” the group says on its web site.
Friday, May 9, 2008
Ethics Reform in Illinois Politics
Mike Tryon, a relatively new State Representative from the McHenry County area is proposing some legislation that would add sunshine and transparency to Illinois government. This legislation is a much needed start to end the pay-for-play politics that have crippled the Blagojevich administration and which the Democrats in charge have allowed. I support Representative Mike Tryon's legislation outlined in his press release below and would co-sponsor it in the House. On another note, my opponent Karen May, was one of only 8 Representatives to vote to give the politicians in Springfield another payraise! She also supported a bill last year that hiked lawmaker pay about 9%. The hubris of these people to take from the government trough when so many Illinoisans are about to break under the financial strain of high gas prices, higher sales taxes, higher property taxes. How many forclosures are underway in this state now? Is it really social justice to vote to allow yourself a pay raise in this situation--especialyl when you helped create it? Don't get me started! Representative Mike Tryon's legislative press release:
A Call to Action:
Web Portal Would End
Culture of Corruption
Since I began serving in the General Assembly, there have been several attempts by lawmakers to pass transparency legislation.
Illinois residents are so tired of corruption in state government with our former governor serving prison time and our current governor under federal investigation.
U.S. Attorney General Patrick Fitzgerald has called the Governor’s administration ‘pay to play on steroids.’
Due to increased infighting between the Governor and the state’s Democrat leaders, suspicion and distrust have replaced compromise and negotiation.
Everyone agrees on the need for transparency to break down the walls of secrecy and bring about real accountability to the process….. but somehow, these pieces of legislation always end up lost in the shuffle. A parliamentary move to keep them in committee or a claim that previous transparency bills are not comprehensive enough has left this issue in limbo.
Enough is enough.
This year, I have introduced the most comprehensive piece of transparency legislation that would shed sunshine on state finances and end this culture of corruption once and for all.
House Bill 4765 would create the Illinois Accountability Portal and would provide the public with direct access to:
• State Employees & Consultants: a database of all current state employees and individual consultants, sorted separately by name, agency, position title, current pay rate and year-to-date pay
• State Expenditures: a database of all current state expenditures, sorted separately by agency, category, customer and representative district
• Tax Credits: a database of all current state tax credits, sorted by tax credit category, customer and representative district
• Sales Tax Breaks: a database of all revocations and suspensions of state occupation and use tax certificates of registration and all revocations and suspensions of state professional licenses sorted by name, geographic location and certificate of registration number or license number, as applicable. Professional licenses revocations and suspensions shall be posted only if resulting from a failure to pay taxes, license fees, or child support.
• State Contracts: a database of all current state contracts, sorted separately by contractor name, awarding officer or agency, contract value, and goods or services provided.
With the help of taxpayer watchdog group Americans for Prosperity who partnered with me on House Bill 4765; this legislation was unanimously approved in the House of Representatives last month.
House Bill 4765 has garnered widespread support from several grassroots organizations, trade associations, press associations, and taxpayer protection groups. More than a dozen local and national organizations have signed a letter in support of the bill.
I firmly believe the Illinois Accountability Portal will reduce the culture of political handouts, pay-to-play politics and pork barrel spending that has tarnished the public’s trust in government.
Over the years, Illinois has invested in technology that can easily put state spending on the desktop. The Illinois Accountability Portal will also be a cost-saving measure as it will reduce the number of Freedom of Information requests that are processed.
Currently, House Bill 4765 is being held hostage in the Senate Rules Committee.
With more than two dozen House sponsors and several Senate sponsors signed on, it is imperative that this bill be given a fair trial and be debated in a Senate Committee.
This week, newspapers reported that Senator Debbie Halvorson was removed as the powerful chairperson of Rules and replaced by Senator Rickey Hendon. With a week to get bills out of Senate Committee, I urge you to call Senator Hendon and demand that he release this bill out of Rules.
Additionally, call your Senator and those serving on the Rules Committee and urge them to help take Illinois off pay to play steroids. Illinois taxpayers deserve to see how their hard-earned money is being spent.
Enough is Enough.
Sincerely,
Michael W. Tryon
Illinois State Representative
64th District
A Call to Action:
Web Portal Would End
Culture of Corruption
Since I began serving in the General Assembly, there have been several attempts by lawmakers to pass transparency legislation.
Illinois residents are so tired of corruption in state government with our former governor serving prison time and our current governor under federal investigation.
U.S. Attorney General Patrick Fitzgerald has called the Governor’s administration ‘pay to play on steroids.’
Due to increased infighting between the Governor and the state’s Democrat leaders, suspicion and distrust have replaced compromise and negotiation.
Everyone agrees on the need for transparency to break down the walls of secrecy and bring about real accountability to the process….. but somehow, these pieces of legislation always end up lost in the shuffle. A parliamentary move to keep them in committee or a claim that previous transparency bills are not comprehensive enough has left this issue in limbo.
Enough is enough.
This year, I have introduced the most comprehensive piece of transparency legislation that would shed sunshine on state finances and end this culture of corruption once and for all.
House Bill 4765 would create the Illinois Accountability Portal and would provide the public with direct access to:
• State Employees & Consultants: a database of all current state employees and individual consultants, sorted separately by name, agency, position title, current pay rate and year-to-date pay
• State Expenditures: a database of all current state expenditures, sorted separately by agency, category, customer and representative district
• Tax Credits: a database of all current state tax credits, sorted by tax credit category, customer and representative district
• Sales Tax Breaks: a database of all revocations and suspensions of state occupation and use tax certificates of registration and all revocations and suspensions of state professional licenses sorted by name, geographic location and certificate of registration number or license number, as applicable. Professional licenses revocations and suspensions shall be posted only if resulting from a failure to pay taxes, license fees, or child support.
• State Contracts: a database of all current state contracts, sorted separately by contractor name, awarding officer or agency, contract value, and goods or services provided.
With the help of taxpayer watchdog group Americans for Prosperity who partnered with me on House Bill 4765; this legislation was unanimously approved in the House of Representatives last month.
House Bill 4765 has garnered widespread support from several grassroots organizations, trade associations, press associations, and taxpayer protection groups. More than a dozen local and national organizations have signed a letter in support of the bill.
I firmly believe the Illinois Accountability Portal will reduce the culture of political handouts, pay-to-play politics and pork barrel spending that has tarnished the public’s trust in government.
Over the years, Illinois has invested in technology that can easily put state spending on the desktop. The Illinois Accountability Portal will also be a cost-saving measure as it will reduce the number of Freedom of Information requests that are processed.
Currently, House Bill 4765 is being held hostage in the Senate Rules Committee.
With more than two dozen House sponsors and several Senate sponsors signed on, it is imperative that this bill be given a fair trial and be debated in a Senate Committee.
This week, newspapers reported that Senator Debbie Halvorson was removed as the powerful chairperson of Rules and replaced by Senator Rickey Hendon. With a week to get bills out of Senate Committee, I urge you to call Senator Hendon and demand that he release this bill out of Rules.
Additionally, call your Senator and those serving on the Rules Committee and urge them to help take Illinois off pay to play steroids. Illinois taxpayers deserve to see how their hard-earned money is being spent.
Enough is Enough.
Sincerely,
Michael W. Tryon
Illinois State Representative
64th District
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
